Who does she think she is? Women, leadership and the 'B'(ias) word

• Published in: Clinical neuropsychologist 2018-02, Vol.32 (2), p.235-251
• Main Author: Kubu, Cynthia S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Altruism; bias; Culture; Female; Gender; Gender Identity; Humans; Leadership; Male; Neuropsychology - trends; Organizations; professionalism; Sexism; Women
• ISSN: 1385-4046; 1744-4144
• DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1418022

Objective: Despite the increasing number of women in professional fields, women are under-represented in leadership roles. The goal of this paper is to identify potential explanations for the gender gap in leadership. Method: The academic literature with respect to gender roles, leadership, and organizational expectations; gender differences in leadership; and the potential role of second generation bias was reviewed. Results: Women are as effective as male leaders in a variety of organizational settings. The role congruity theory suggests that women are placed in a double bind: maintenance of their gender role may result in a failure to meet the requirements of a leader role whereas conforming to a leader role may result in the failure to conform to their gender role. Second generation, or implicit, bias also influences women's leadership opportunities. This is further complicated by expectations that women will engage in more altruistic organizational citizenship behaviors or be penalized. Conclusion: Differences in ability do not account for the gender gap in leadership. Cultural factors, including gender role and leadership expectations, organizational demands, and second-generation bias impact women's ability to lead. Pragmatic recommendations to increase women's influence and representation in leadership are provided.