Understanding overpressure in the FAA aerosol can test by C 3 H 2 F 3 Br (2-BTP)

• Published in: Combustion and flame 2016-05, Vol.167, p.452
• Main Authors: Linteris, Gregory Thomas, Babushok, Valeri Ivan, Pagliaro, John Leonard, Burgess, Jr, Donald Raymond, Manion, Jeffrey Alan, Takahashi, Fumiaki, Katta, Viswanath Reddy, Baker, Patrick Thomas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0010-2180

Thermodynamic equilibrium calculations, as well as perfectly-stirred reactor (PSR) simulations with detailed reaction kinetics, are performed for a potential halon replacement, C H F Br (2-BTP, C H F Br, 2-Bromo-3,3,3-trifluoropropene), to understand the reasons for the unexpected enhanced combustion rather than suppression in a mandated FAA test. The high pressure rise with added agent is shown to depend on the amount of agent, and is well-predicted by an equilibrium model corresponding to stoichiometric reaction of fuel, oxygen, and agent. A kinetic model for the reaction of C H F Br in hydrocarbon-air flames has been applied to understand differences in the chemical suppression behavior of C H F Br vs. CF Br in the FAA test. Stirred-reactor simulations predict that in the conditions of the FAA test, the inhibition effectiveness of C H F Br at high agent loadings is relatively insensitive to the overall stoichiometry (for fuel-lean conditions), and the marginal inhibitory effect of the agent is greatly reduced, so that the mixture remains flammable over a wide range of conditions. Most important, the flammability of the agent-air mixtures themselves (when compressively preheated), can support low-strain flames which are much more difficult to extinguish than the easy-to extinguish, high-strain primary fireball from the impulsively released fuel mixture. Hence, the exothermic reaction of halogenated hydrocarbons in air should be considered in other situations with strong ignition sources and low strain flows, especially at preheated conditions.