Association between atrial fibrillation and heart failure with different ejection fraction categories and its influence on outcomes

• Published in: Acta Cardiologica 2020-09, Vol.75 (5), p.423-432
• Main Authors: Xu, Hai-Xia, Zhu, Yan-Min, Hua, Ying, Huang, Yin-Hao, Lu, Qi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: atrial fibrillation; ejection fraction; Heart failure; outcomes
• ISSN: 0001-5385; 0373-7934; 1784-973X
• DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2019.1610834

Background: The important role of atrial fibrillation (AF) in different types of heart failure (HF) according to ejection fraction (EF) is much less explored. In this study, we compared AF in HF with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) and reduced (HFrEF) EF with regard to prevalence, association, and prognostic role. Methods and results: A total of 405 inpatients with HF between February 2014 and June 2016 were prospectively analysed in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: HFrEF group (n = 109, 26.9%), HFmrEF group (n = 94, 23.2%), and HFpEF group (n = 202, 49.8%). There was a higher prevalence of AF in patients in the HFpEF and HFmrEF groups than in patients in the HFrEF. Several baseline variables were found to be independently associated with AF, including age, coronary heart disease, heart rate, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter, regardless of EF category after multivariable adjustment. In addition, AF was found to be a more powerful predictor of all-cause mortality, HF rehospitalisation, and the composite event of all-cause mortality or rehospitalisation in HFpEF and HFmrEF patients, but not in HFrEF patients. Conclusions: HFmrEF resembled HFpEF rather than HFrEF with regard to both a higher prevalence of AF and a greater risk of all-cause mortality, HF rehospitalisation, and the composite event of all-cause mortality or rehospitalisation.