Multiple craniotomies in a single surgery — the resection of scattered brain metastases

• Published in: Neurosurgical review 2023-03, Vol.46 (1), p.70-70, Article 70
• Main Authors: Bschorer, Maximilian, Ricklefs, Franz L., Sauvigny, Thomas, Westphal, Manfred, Dührsen, Lasse
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms - pathology; Craniotomy - methods; Humans; Karnofsky Performance Status; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1437-2320; 0344-5607; 1437-2320
• DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-01976-8

Patients with brain metastases (BM), who can benefit from resection of multiple scattered lesions, often will not be offered a procedure involving multiple craniotomies in one session due to the overall poor prognosis. However, carefully selected candidates may well benefit from the resection of multiple lesions using multiple craniotomies through a significantly shortened hospital stay, aggressive decompression, and rapid eligibility for adjuvant therapies. In this retrospective analysis, the records of patients, who were treated for multiple BM using one surgical session involving multiple craniotomies, were reviewed. A group of patients with multiple BM, whose surgery only involved one craniotomy, were assigned to a control group. Clinical and surgical characteristics, preoperative and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), complication rate, preoperative tumor size, number of lesions, number of craniotomies, skin incisions, and intraoperative repositioning of patients were recorded. Thirty-three patients were included in the multiple-craniotomy group. Thirty patients underwent two craniotomies, while three cases involved three craniotomies. Seven patients (21%) were intraoperatively repositioned from a prone to a supine position, which required an average of 23.3 ± 9.3 min from wound closure to the following skin incision. Thirty-six patients with multiple BM and matching characteristics, who received only one craniotomy for the dominant lesion, served as the control group. No difference was detected in postoperative KPS ( p  = 0.269), complication rate ( p  = 0.612), rate of new postoperative neurological deficits ( p  = 0.278), length of intensive care unit (ICU) ( p  = 0.991), and hospital stay ( p  = 0.913). There was a significant difference in average preoperative tumor size ( p  = 0.002), duration of surgery ( p