Loading…

Antiviral drugs block replication of highly immune-evasive Omicron subvariants ex vivo, but fail to reduce tissue inflammation

The identification of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants BA.4/BA.5, BF.7 and BQ.1.1 immediately raised concerns regarding the efficacy of currently used monoclonal antibody therapies. Here we examined the activity of monoclonal antibody therapies and antiviral drugs against clinical specimens for SARS-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antiviral research 2023-05, Vol.213, p.105581-105581, Article 105581
Main Authors: Dichtl, Stefanie, Diem, Gabriel, Jäger, Michael, Zaderer, Viktoria, Lupoli, Gaia, Dächert, Christopher, Muenchhoff, Maximilian, Graf, Alexander, Blum, Helmut, Keppler, Oliver T., Lass-Flörl, Cornelia, Weiss, Günter, Wilflingseder, Doris, Posch, Wilfried
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The identification of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants BA.4/BA.5, BF.7 and BQ.1.1 immediately raised concerns regarding the efficacy of currently used monoclonal antibody therapies. Here we examined the activity of monoclonal antibody therapies and antiviral drugs against clinical specimens for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/BA.5, BF.7 and BQ.1.1 employing an immunofluorescence neutralization assay. Further we explored treatment of BA.4/BA.5 infections with efficient antiviral drugs and monoclonal antibodies in a 3D model of primary human bronchial epithelial cells. We found that the antiviral drugs Molnupiravir, Nirmatrelvir and Remdesivir efficiently inhibit BA.4/BA.5, BF.7 and BQ.1.1 replication. In contrast, only the monoclonal antibody Cilgavimab exerted an inhibitory effect, while Tixagevimab, Regdanvimab and Sotrovimab lost their efficacy against BA.4/BA.5. We found that only the prophylactic treatment with Cilgavimab impacted on tissue inflammation by reducing intracellular complement component 3 (C3) activation following BA.4/BA.5 infection in primary human airway epithelial grown in air-liquid-interphase, which was not the case when using antiviral drugs or Cilgavimab after establishment of infection. Of note, all tested monoclonal antibodies had no neutralizing activity during infection by BF.7 and BQ.1.1 variants. Our results suggest that despite a marked reduction of viral replication, potent antiviral drugs fail to reduce tissue levels of inflammatory compounds such as C3, which can still result in tissue destruction. •Antiviral and neutralizing capacity of COVID-19 drugs analyzed in a 3D airway model.•Antiviral drugs are effective against BA.4/BA.5, BF.7 and BQ.1.1•Prophylactic use of Cilgavimab reduced innate immune activation within the 3D model.•Antiviral drugs could not reduce intracellular complement component 3.
ISSN:0166-3542
1872-9096
DOI:10.1016/j.antiviral.2023.105581