The incidence of non-affective psychotic disorders in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2023-04, Vol.58 (4), p.523-536
• Main Authors: Bastien, Rayanne John-Baptiste, Ding, Tao, Gonzalez-Valderrama, Alfonso, Valmaggia, Lucia, Kirkbride, James B., Jongsma, Hannah E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Affective Disorders, Psychotic; Analysis; Confidence intervals; Criteria; Developing Countries; Disorders; Epidemiology; Global Health; Heterogeneity; Humans; Incidence; Income; Medical research; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Medicine, Experimental; Mental health; Meta-analysis; Original Paper; Psychiatry; Psychoses; Psychosis; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology; Quality assessment; Systematic review
• ISSN: 0933-7954; 1433-9285
• DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02397-6

Purpose Global understanding of the epidemiological landscape of non-affective psychotic disorders (NAPD) is predominantly based on studies from high-income countries. We sought to systematically review and meta-analyse all incidence studies conducted in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods We systematically searched four databases using terms for NAPD, incidence and LMICs. Citations were eligible for inclusion if: published between 1 January 1960 and 31 May 2022; wholly or partially conducted in an LMIC, and; containing data on NAPD incidence in the general adult population. Two independent raters assessed study quality according to previously published criteria. We conducted a narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses where sufficient studies were available ( N  ≥ 5). Results We retrieved 11 421 records, of which 23 citations met inclusion criteria from 18 unique studies across 19 settings in 10 LMICs. Median study quality was 4 out of 7 (interquartile range: 3–6). The crude incidence of NAPD varied around 4.2 times, from 10.0 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.7–11.4) in Brazil to 42.0 (95%CI 32.2–54.8) in India, with marked heterogeneity in methodologies and rates. Our 60-year review highlights the dearth of robust evidence on the incidence of psychotic disorders in LMICs. Conclusion Without reliable, contemporary estimates of this fundamental cornerstone of population health, it is impossible to understand the true burden, distribution or causes of psychotic disorders in over 87% of the world’s population. A new, more equitable global mental health evidence base for NAPD is now urgently required.