Loading…

Artifact-Free Microstructures in the Interfacial Reaction between Eutectic In-48Sn and Cu Using Ion Milling

Eutectic In-48Sn was considered a promising candidate for low-temperature solder due to its low melting point and excellent mechanical properties. Both Cu (In,Sn) and Cu(In,Sn) formation were observed at the In-48Sn/Cu interface after 160 °C soldering. However, traditional mechanical polishing produ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials 2023-04, Vol.16 (9), p.3290
Main Authors: Chang, Fu-Ling, Lin, Yu-Hsin, Hung, Han-Tang, Kao, Chen-Wei, Kao, C R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Eutectic In-48Sn was considered a promising candidate for low-temperature solder due to its low melting point and excellent mechanical properties. Both Cu (In,Sn) and Cu(In,Sn) formation were observed at the In-48Sn/Cu interface after 160 °C soldering. However, traditional mechanical polishing produces many defects at the In-48Sn/Cu interface, which may affect the accuracy of interfacial reaction investigations. In this study, cryogenic broad Ar beam ion milling was used to investigate the interfacial reaction between In-48Sn and Cu during soldering. The phase Cu (Sn,In) was confirmed as the only intermetallic compound formed during 150 °C soldering, while Cu(In,Sn) formation was proven to be caused by room-temperature aging after soldering. Both the Cu (Sn,In) and Cu(In,Sn) phases were confirmed by EPMA quantitative analysis and TEM selected area electron diffraction. The microstructure evolution and growth mechanism of Cu (Sn,In) during soldering were proposed. In addition, the Young's modulus and hardness of Cu (Sn,In) were determined to be 119.04 ± 3.94 GPa and 6.28 ± 0.13 GPa, respectively, suggesting that the doping of In in Cu (Sn,In) has almost no effect on Young's modulus and hardness.
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma16093290