Loading…
A new risk score model based on lactate dehydrogenase for predicting prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy
The prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has been confirmed in many malignant tumors, but it has not been widely discussed in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of LDH in patients with ESCC and to generate a risk score model to predict p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of thoracic disease 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.2116-2128 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has been confirmed in many malignant tumors, but it has not been widely discussed in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of LDH in patients with ESCC and to generate a risk score model to predict prognosis in patients who were treated with chemoradiotherapy.
A total of 614 patients with ESCC who received chemoradiotherapy from 2012 to 2016 were examined in this single-center retrospective study. The optimal cutoff points for age, cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (Cyfra21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumor length, total dose, and LDH were calculated by the X-tile software. We analyzed the association between the level of LDH and clinicopathological characteristics, and a 1:3 propensity score matching analysis was used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to determine the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Based on the results, we developed a corresponding risk score model and established a nomogram to assess its predictive capacity.
The optimal cutoff point of LDH was 134 U/L. Patients in the high-LDH group had significantly shorter PFS and worse OS than did those in the low-LDH group (all P values |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2072-1439 2077-6624 |
DOI: | 10.21037/jtd-23-388 |