Loading…
Prognostic implications of RAS alterations in diverse malignancies and impact of targeted therapies
RAS alterations are often found in difficult‐to‐treat malignancies and are considered “undruggable.” To better understand the clinical correlates and coaltered genes of RAS alterations, we used targeted next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze 1,937 patients with diverse cancers. Overall, 20.9% o...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of cancer 2020-06, Vol.146 (12), p.3450-3460 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | RAS alterations are often found in difficult‐to‐treat malignancies and are considered “undruggable.” To better understand the clinical correlates and coaltered genes of RAS alterations, we used targeted next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze 1,937 patients with diverse cancers. Overall, 20.9% of cancers (405/1,937) harbored RAS alterations. Most RAS‐altered cases had genomic coalterations (95.3%, median: 3, range: 0–51), often involving genes implicated in oncogenic signals: PI3K pathway (31.4% of 405 cases), cell cycle (31.1%), tyrosine kinase families (21.5%) and MAPK signaling (18.3%). Patients with RAS‐altered versus wild‐type RAS malignancies had significantly worse overall survival (OS; p = 0.02 [multivariate]), with KRAS alterations, in particular, showing shorter survival. Moreover, coalterations in both RAS and PI3K signaling or cell‐cycle‐associated genes correlated with worse OS (p = 0.004 and p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijc.32813 |