A novel application of spectrograms with machine learning can detect patient ventilator dyssynchrony

• Published in: Biomedical signal processing and control 2023-09, Vol.86 (Pt C), p.105251, Article 105251
• Main Authors: Obeso, Ishmael, Yoon, Benjamin, Ledbetter, David, Aczon, Melissa, Laksana, Eugene, Zhou, Alice, Eckberg, R. Andrew, Mertan, Keith, Khemani, Robinder G., Wetzel, Randall
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Convolutional Neural Network; Double cycling; Dyssynchrony; Inadequate Support; Mechanical ventilation; Reverse Trigger; Spectrogram
• ISSN: 1746-8094; 1746-8108
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105251

Patients in intensive care units are frequently supported by mechanical ventilation. There is increasing awareness of patient-ventilator dyssynchrony (PVD), a mismatch between patient respiratory effort and assistance provided by the ventilator, as a risk factor for infection, narcotic exposure, lung injury, and adverse neurocognitive effects. One of the most injurious consequences of PVD are double cycled (DC) breaths when two breaths are delivered by the ventilator instead of one. Prior efforts to identify PVD have limited efficacy. An automated method to identify PVD, independent of clinician expertise, acumen, or time, would potentially permit early, targeted treatment to avoid further harm. We performed secondary analyses of data from a clinical trial of children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Waveforms of ventilator flow, airway pressure and esophageal manometry were annotated to identify DC breaths and underlying PVD subtypes. Spectrograms were generated from those waveforms to train Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models in detecting DC and underlying PVD subtypes: Reverse Trigger (RT) and Inadequate Support (IS). The DC breath detection model yielded AUROC of 0.980, while the multi-target detection model for underlying dyssynchrony yielded AUROC of 0.980 (RT) and 0.976 (IS). When operating at 75% sensitivity, DC breath detection had a number needed to alert (NNA) 1.3 (99% specificity), while underlying PVD had a NNA 1.6 (98.5% specificity) for RT and NNA 4.0 (98.2% specificity) for IS. CNNs using spectrograms of ventilator waveforms can identify DC breaths and detect the underlying PVD for targeted clinical interventions. [Display omitted]