Loading…

Normalizing real-time PCR results in routine testing

Normalization, the process of controlling for normal variation in sampling and testing, can be achieved in real-time PCR assays by converting sample quantification cycles (Cqs) to “efficiency standardized Cqs” (ECqs). We calculated ECqs as E−ΔCq, where E is amplification efficiency and ΔCq is the di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation 2024-01, Vol.36 (1), p.78-85
Main Authors: Armenta-Leyva, Betsy, Munguía-Ramírez, Berenice, Cheng, Ting-Yu, Ye, Fangshu, Henao-Díaz, Alexandra, Giménez-Lirola, Luis G., Zimmerman, Jeffrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Normalization, the process of controlling for normal variation in sampling and testing, can be achieved in real-time PCR assays by converting sample quantification cycles (Cqs) to “efficiency standardized Cqs” (ECqs). We calculated ECqs as E−ΔCq, where E is amplification efficiency and ΔCq is the difference between sample and reference standard Cqs. To apply this approach to a commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) RT-qPCR assay, we created reference standards by rehydrating and then diluting (1 × 10−4) a PRRSV modified-live vaccine (PRRS MLV; Ingelvac) with serum or oral fluid (OF) to match the sample matrix to be tested. Sample ECqs were calculated using the mean E and reference standard Cq calculated from the 4 reference standards on each plate. Serum (n = 132) and OF (n = 130) samples were collected from each of 12 pigs vaccinated with a PRRSV MLV from −7 to 42 d post-vaccination, tested, and sample Cqs converted to ECqs. Mean plate Es were 1.75–2.6 for serum and 1.7–2.3 for OF. Mean plate reference standard Cqs were 29.1–31.3 for serum and 29.2–31.5 for OFs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis calculated the area under the curve for serum and OF sample ECqs as 0.999 (95% CI: 0.997, 1.000) and 0.947 (0.890, 1.000), respectively. For serum, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the commercial PRRSV RT-qPCR assay were estimated as 97.9% and 100% at an ECq cutoff ≥ 0.20, and for OF, 82.6% and 100%, respectively, at an ECq cutoff ≥ 0.45.
ISSN:1040-6387
1943-4936
1943-4936
DOI:10.1177/10406387231206080