A Clinical Audit of Operation Notes Documentation and the Impact of Introducing an Improved Proforma: An Audit Cycle

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-12, Vol.15 (12), p.e50281-e50281
• Main Authors: Hassan, Rao Erbaz, Akbar, Ismail, Khan, Arif Ullah, Hameed, Muhammad Bilal, Raza, Muhammad, Shah, Syed H, Haroon, Hamza, Hanzala, Rao Aizaz
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Audit cycles; Audits; Clinical outcomes; Disease prevention; Documentation; General Surgery; Hospitals; Prostheses; Quality Improvement; Surgeons; Surgical mesh; Thrombosis
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50281

Introduction Accurate and comprehensive documentation of surgical procedures is vital in healthcare for both medical and legal purposes. This audit assessed adherence to international guidelines for operative note documentation in a general surgery department and the impact of introducing educational initiatives and an enhanced proforma. Methods A retrospective audit of 100 operative notes was conducted in April 2023, followed by a prospective re-audit of another 100 notes in October-November 2023. A checklist based on Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) guidelines assessed 20 parameters. An improved proforma and an awareness session for surgeons were implemented between audits. Data analysis utilized the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). A paired-sample t-test was used, and a p-value < 0.001 was considered statistically significant. Results The initial audit revealed discrepancies in documentation, with missing information on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, elective/emergency settings, anticipated blood loss, closure technique specifics, and prosthesis/mesh details. Legibility was satisfactory in 88% of notes. After implementing the proforma and awareness session, significant improvements were observed in all parameters, with documentation rates exceeding 91%. Overall documentation completeness increased from 65.2% to 95.2%. Results of the paired-sample t-test indicated a significant difference before and after the introduction of the new proforma (Mean (M) = 65.2, standard deviation (SD) = 34.3 versus M = 95.2, SD = 4.3) with a p-value of 0.0005. Conclusion Regular audits, surgeon education, and standardized proformas are essential for maintaining high standards in operative note documentation, contributing to improved patient care and safety.