Clinical academics’ experiences of REF2021

The UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is an assessment of the quality of research carried out in UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), performed in 7-year cycles. The outcome impacts the rankings and funding of UK HEIs, which afford the exercise high priority. Much of what REF measures is kn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical medicine (London, England) England), 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.100002-5, Article 100002
Main Authors: Davies, Angharad P., McKinley, Robert, Gabbay, Mark, Katz, David, Strain, W David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical academia
Higher education
Minority & ethnic groups
REF
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is an assessment of the quality of research carried out in UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), performed in 7-year cycles. The outcome impacts the rankings and funding of UK HEIs, which afford the exercise high priority. Much of what REF measures is known to be biased against academics with protected characteristics: for example, women and ethnic minority researchers are less likely to win grants or be published in prestigious journals. Despite changes to REF since 2014, the risk remains that the process might amplify well-recognised existing disparities. The BMA Women in Academic Medicine and Medical Academic Staff Committee carried out a survey of UK clinical academics’ experiences of REF2021. The data indicated the persistence of activities previously characterised as ‘extremely harmful’ in Research England-commissioned work, affecting up to 10% of clinical academics. While acknowledging the limitations of the data, women appeared to be disproportionately affected.
ISSN:1470-2118
1473-4893
DOI:10.1016/j.clinme.2023.100002