Stage Migration in Canine Multicentric Lymphoma: Impact of Diagnostic Techniques on Assessing Disease Extent

Stage migration, a phenomenon triggered by technological advancements allowing more sensitive tumor spread detection, results in alterations in the distribution of cancer stages within a population. Canine multicentric lymphoma is staged I to V based on the affected anatomic site(s) and substage a o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:In vivo (Athens) 2024-05, Vol.38 (3), p.1429-1435
Main Authors: Pinto, Maria Teresa, Portillo, Isabel, Borrego, Juan, Queiroga, Felisbina L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Dog Diseases - diagnosis
Dog Diseases - pathology
Dogs
Female
Immunophenotyping
Lymphoma - diagnosis
Lymphoma - pathology
Lymphoma - veterinary
Male
Neoplasm Staging
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Stage migration, a phenomenon triggered by technological advancements allowing more sensitive tumor spread detection, results in alterations in the distribution of cancer stages within a population. Canine multicentric lymphoma is staged I to V based on the affected anatomic site(s) and substage a or b depending on the presence of tumor-related clinical signs. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of various diagnostic techniques on staging accuracy and determine whether multiple staging methods lead to significant stage migration, impacting the reliability of disease stage assignments. Dogs cytologically diagnosed with multicentric lymphoma were staged using four different staging methods (A-D): A (physical examination, hemogram, blood smear), B (A plus thoracic X-ray, abdominal ultrasound), C (B plus liver and spleen cytology) and D (C plus bone marrow cytology). Twenty-three dogs were enrolled: 16 females (70%) and seven males (30%). Regarding immunophenotype, 21 dogs (91.3%) were B-cell and two dogs (8.7%) were T-cell. Stage migration was observed between all staging methods. Between A and B, 12 animals migrated from stage III to stage IV. Between B and C, four animals migrated, three to a higher stage (stage III to IV) and one to a lower stage (stage IV to III). Between C and D, one animal migrated from stage IV to V. The differences between staging methods A and B were statistically significant (p≤0.001). Stage migration in canine multicentric lymphoma depends on the diagnostic methods used and reinforces the need to use standardized staging methods to avoid it.
ISSN:0258-851X
1791-7549
DOI:10.21873/invivo.13585