Loading…

Prognostic Impact of the Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion/Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure Ratio in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Currently available risk stratification models for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) include hemodynamic status, cardiac biomarkers, right ventricle (RV) dysfunction on imaging, and clinical scores. Focusing on the length-tension relationship of the ventricle might have a superior predictive capability...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anatolian journal of cardiology 2024-10, Vol.28 (10), p.479-485
Main Authors: Kültürsay, Barkın, Keskin, Berhan, Tanyeri, Seda, Külahçıoğlu, Şeyhmus, Hakgör, Aykun, Mutlu, Deniz, Buluş, Çağdaş, Tokgöz, Hacer Ceren, Yücel, Enver, Sekban, Ahmet, Sırma, Dicle, Karagöz, Ali, Tanboğa, İbrahim Halil, Özdemir, Nihal, Kaymaz, Cihangir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Currently available risk stratification models for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) include hemodynamic status, cardiac biomarkers, right ventricle (RV) dysfunction on imaging, and clinical scores. Focusing on the length-tension relationship of the ventricle might have a superior predictive capability over RV dysfunction in terms of mortality and classification of patients with acute PE. In this study, our hypothesis suggests that the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ratio has superior predictive capability for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute PE compared to TAPSE or sPAP as distinct measures. This single-center study comprised retrospectively evaluated 703 patients referred to our tertiary cardiovascular center with acute PE. We divided patients into quartiles based on the TAPSE/sPAP ratio. Different models were developed to quantify the predictive relationship between in-hospital death and echocardiographic measurements. A base model was created with variables including risk status and RV/LV ratio >1. Then, to evaluate the predictive contribution of each measurement; TAPSE/sPAP, TAPSE, and sPAP were sequentially added to the base model. After that, the performance of each model was evaluated. Predictive and discriminative power was the highest in model containing TAPSE/sPAP. There was still a significant inverse association between TAPSE/sPAP and the risk of in-hospital death even after adjusting for risk status and RV/LV ratio >1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for TAPSE/sPAP revealed the best cut-off value as 0.34. The outcomes of our study reveal that the ratio of TAPSE/sPAP serves as a more potent predictor of mortality than either of the 2 measurements taken separately. The interpretation and utilization of the TAPSE/sPAP cut-off value in acute PE can assist in identifying patients at risk of deterioration and guide the consideration of more intensive treatment options across all risk groups.
ISSN:2149-2263
2149-2271
2149-2271
DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4110