Loading…

Nilotinib vs dasatinib in achieving MR4.5 for de novo chronic myeloid leukemia: the randomized JALSG CML212 study

•Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors are more effective than imatinib for de novo CML-CP.•It is important to clarify which tyrosine kinase inhibitors is best to achieve DMR required for TFR. [Display omitted] Deep molecular response (DMR) is a prerequite for treatment-free remission (TFR) i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood advances 2024-10, Vol.8 (20), p.5237-5247
Main Authors: Matsumura, Itaru, Ohtake, Shigeki, Atsuta, Yoshiko, Kurata, Mio, Minami, Yosuke, Takahashi, Naoto, Nakaseko, Chiaki, Iriyama, Noriyoshi, Fujimaki, Katsumichi, Kakihana, Kazuhiko, Ogasawara, Yoji, Ono, Takaaki, Okada, Masaya, Tauchi, Tetsuzo, Miyamoto, Toshihiro, Ohnishi, Kazunori, Sakaida, Emiko, Fujisawa, Shin, Kobayashi, Yukio, Asou, Norio, Naoe, Tomoki, Kiyoi, Hitoshi, Miyazaki, Yasushi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors are more effective than imatinib for de novo CML-CP.•It is important to clarify which tyrosine kinase inhibitors is best to achieve DMR required for TFR. [Display omitted] Deep molecular response (DMR) is a prerequite for treatment-free remission (TFR) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). The JALSG (Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group) conducted a prospective randomized phase 3 CML212 study for de novo CML-CP to compare the cumulative achievement of molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5; international scale BCR::ABL1 ≤0.0032%) by 18 months between nilotinib and dasatinib treatment as a primary end point. A total of 454 patients were randomly assigned to the 300 mg nilotinib twice daily arm or to the 100 mg dasatinib daily arm (both n = 227). BCR::ABL1 messenger RNA levels were monitored every 3 months. Study treatment was stopped if the patients were judged as failure according to the European LekemiaNet 2009 criteria or showed intolerance. The cumulative achievement rates of MR4.5 by 18 months were 32.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.5-39.1) in the nilotinib arm and 30.8% (95% CI, 24.9-37.3) in the dasatinib arm with no significant difference (P = .66). The cumulative achievement rates of early molecular response, complete cytogenetic response, and major molecular response by 12, 18, 24, and 36 months were almost the same between the 2 arms. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the 2 arms by log-rank tests (PFS, P = .58; OS, P = .64). These results suggest that nilotinib and dasatinib would be equally effective for patients with de novo CML-CP. This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as #UMIN000007909.
ISSN:2473-9529
2473-9537
2473-9537
DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012655