A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to reduce burden, stress, and strain in informal stroke caregivers

• Published in: Clinical rehabilitation 2024-11, Vol.38 (11), p.1429-1445
• Main Authors: Jammal, Melissa, Kolt, Gregory S, Liu, Karen P Y, Guagliano, Justin M, Dennaoui, Nariman, George, Emma S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Caregiver burden; Caregiver Burden - rehabilitation; Caregivers; Caregivers - psychology; Clinical trials; Evaluative Studies; Humans; Intervention; Meta-analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stress; Stress, Psychological - rehabilitation; Stroke; Stroke - therapy; Stroke Rehabilitation - methods; Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology; Systematic review
• ISSN: 0269-2155; 1477-0873; 1477-0873
• DOI: 10.1177/02692155241271047

Objectives To understand the nature and effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving informal stroke caregiver burden, stress, and strain. Data sources In line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted in May 2022. Review methods Studies were eligible if they included an intervention designed for informal stroke caregivers, reported on caregiver burden, strain, or stress, were published in English, and used a randomized controlled trial design. An updated search was conducted in June 2024. The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for caregiver burden and strain outcomes. Results Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were meta-analyzed. Interventions ranged from 4 days to 12 months. Most studies incorporated educational and/or support components. Meta-analyses revealed nonsignificant effects on caregiver burden or strain. Significant between-group differences for caregiver strain and burden were, however, found in seven studies. Conclusion Limited studies, small sample sizes, and conflicting results made definitive conclusions on the most effective intervention characteristics for improving caregiver outcomes difficult. Of the 19 studies, seven found significant between-group differences for caregiver outcomes postintervention, and these tended to incorporate educational components and comprised between seven and nine sessions. Further high-quality research is required to identify optimal format, duration, and frequency for improving caregiver outcomes.