Ultra-Processed Food Intake and Risk of Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Nutrients 2024-11, Vol.16 (21), p.3767
• Main Authors: Pourmotabbed, Ali, Awlqadr, Farhang Hameed, Mehrabani, Sanaz, Babaei, Atefeh, Wong, Alexei, Ghoreishy, Seyed Mojtaba, Talebi, Sepide, Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati, Jalili, Faramarz, Moradi, Sajjad, Bagheri, Reza, Dutheil, Fred
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Diet; Eating; Fast Foods - adverse effects; Female; Food; Food habits; Food Handling; Food, Processed; Gender; Human health and pathology; Humans; Insomnia; Life Sciences; Male; Marketing research; Meta-analysis; Middle Aged; Observational studies; Odds Ratio; Online databases; Processed foods; Review; Risk Factors; Sleep; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders - epidemiology; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders - etiology; Systematic review; Teenagers
• ISSN: 2072-6643; 2072-6643
• DOI: 10.3390/nu16213767

The objective of this investigation was to compile existing observational research and quantify the potential association between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and the risk of insomnia using meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases with no restrictions until 29 June 2024. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were aggregated using a random-effects model, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Egger's regression asymmetry test assessed study quality and publication bias, respectively. Analysis of data from seven studies showed a significant positive association between higher intake of UPFs and an increased risk of insomnia (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.95; I = 62.3%; = 0.014). Subgroup analysis indicated this positive relationship was particularly strong under the NOVA food classification (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.40; I = 78.5%; = 0.009; n = 3) and with snack intake (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.71; I = 0.0%; < 0.001; n = 2), compared to adherence to Western dietary patterns. Moreover, subgroup analysis based on age group showed that higher UPF intake was significantly associated with increased risk of insomnia among adolescents (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.99; I = 57.4%; < 0.001) but not in adults. Our findings underscore a significant association between higher consumption of UPFs and increased risk of insomnia, particularly among adolescents. Further research is necessary to explore the intricacies of this association and to ensure the generalizability of these results.