Loading…
Can simple measures from clinical practice serve as a proxy for sarcopenic obesity and identify mortality risk?
Background Sarcopenic obesity is a condition where loss of muscle mass occurs alongside fat gain, and it is considered a risk factor for mortality. However, the use of various definitions for this condition has led to conflicting results. Aim To investigate whether the coexistence of low muscle mass...
Saved in:
Published in: | Aging clinical and experimental research 2024-11, Vol.36 (1), p.222, Article 222 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Sarcopenic obesity is a condition where loss of muscle mass occurs alongside fat gain, and it is considered a risk factor for mortality. However, the use of various definitions for this condition has led to conflicting results.
Aim
To investigate whether the coexistence of low muscle mass and abdominal obesity, defined using two simple measures employed in clinical practice, is a risk factor for mortality in individuals aged 50 or older.
Methods
A longitudinal study with a 14-year follow-up was conducted involving 5,440 participants of the
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
. Abdominal obesity and low muscle mass were respectively defined based on high waist circumference and low skeletal muscle mass index (SMMI) determined by an equation. The sample was divided into four groups: non-low muscle mass/non-abdominal obesity (NLMM/NAO), non-low muscle mass/abdominal obesity (NLMM/AO), low muscle mass/non-abdominal obesity (LMM/NAO), and low muscle mass/abdominal obesity (LMM/AO). Cox regression models were used to estimate the mortality risk as a function of muscle mass and abdominal obesity status.
Results
LMM/AO increased the risk of death by 83% (HR:1.83; 95%CI: 1.35–2.66) compared to those in the NLMM/NAO group. AO alone was not associated with a greater risk of mortality (HR:1.09; 95%CI: 0.93–1.27), whereas LMM alone increased the risk by 40% (HR:1.40; 95%CI:1.18–1.66).
Conclusions
Identifying LMM/AO in individuals aged 50 or older can be crucial for predicting the risk of mortality. Simple and easily applicable measures can serve as a proxy for sarcopenic obesity and aid in implementing the necessary interventions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1720-8319 1594-0667 1720-8319 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40520-024-02866-9 |