Associations Between Deficit Accumulation Frailty and Baseline Markers of Lifestyle and Health in the U.S. POINTER Trial

• Published in: Alzheimer's & dementia 2024-12, Vol.20 (S7), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Espeland, Mark A., Demesie, Yitbarek N, Cleveland, Maryjo, Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski, Baker, Laura D, Crivelli, Lucia, Garcia, Katelyn R, Lockhart, Samuel N., Olson, KayLoni, Snyder, Heather M, Tangney, Christy C, Wing, Rena R., Whitmer, Rachel A., York, Michelle, Callahan, Kathryn E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Public Health
• ISSN: 1552-5260; 1552-5279
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.088205

Background Behavioral interventions designed to promote healthy lifestyles have the potential to slow biological aging and increase health span. Multidomain interventions that simultaneously target multiple lifestyle behaviors may particularly be promising by increasing the number of interrelated processes that might be benefited. Deficit accumulation frailty indices (FIs) are increasingly used as measures of aging and health status in clinical trials and cohort studies. Method A 49‐component FI was developed from baseline measures of age‐related 1) physical function and abilities, 2) cognitive function, 3) health related quality of life, 4) mood and affect, 5) clinical biomarkers, 6) physical measures, 5) sleep quality, 8) chronic diseases, 9) sensorineural abilities, 10) polypharmacy, and 11) behaviors. The FI was calculated for the 2,111 participants of the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER), a two‐armed randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two multidomain lifestyle interventions on cognitive function. Associations between the FI and markers of intervention targets were assessed using correlation coefficients after covariate adjustment for age, gender, and clinical site. Result The 25%ile, 50%ile, and 75%ile of the FI distribution (Figure 1) were 0.112, 0.153, and 0.199 and are consistent with a cohort at risk for accelerated aging. Mean FI scores were greater by 13% among males compared with females and by 36% among those aged 75‐79 years compared with those aged 60‐64 years (Table 1; both p