Loading…

OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document

IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectivenes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S24-S24
Main Authors: Pierre, Miranda, Dickson, Jennifer, Lockhart, Lindsay, McCormack, Jackie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the medicine, as well as the input from patient groups (PGs), patients, and carers. In 2020, SMC commenced a stakeholder evaluation of the DAD including a workshop with PGs and public partners (members of the public who volunteer with SMC) to explore the potential for using the DAD more widely.MethodsPGs and public partners, all having significant experience of engaging with SMC, participated in the workshop. Feedback was gathered using virtual post-it notes, collated and analysed for key themes. We also gathered oral feedback from participants. Sample DADs were distributed for two medicines recently appraised, one of which included a Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meeting. These were chosen because they reflect different aspects of public and patient involvement at SMC, including how this is presented in the DAD.ResultsOverall, the workshop participants (n=7) recognised the DAD was a useful document for the clinicians who are its primary audience. Its language was perceived to be challenging, including complex information that is not accessible to a wide audience and may only be fully understood by those with a good understanding and knowledge of HTA. This was a key barrier to using the DAD more widely, in particular the health economics information. Suggestions for broadening the audience of the DAD included summaries of key points and an introductory section clarifying the purpose of the DAD and its intended audience, along with signposting to the plain language summary produced by SMC. These will be implemented where possible.ConclusionsImproving how SMC communicates decisions to patients and the public, by working in partnership with these stakeholders, will help strengthen public involvement throughout the HTA process.
ISSN:0266-4623
1471-6348
DOI:10.1017/S0266462322001143