Loading…

OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document

IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectivenes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S24-S24
Main Authors: Pierre, Miranda, Dickson, Jennifer, Lockhart, Lindsay, McCormack, Jackie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S24
container_issue S1
container_start_page S24
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 38
creator Pierre, Miranda
Dickson, Jennifer
Lockhart, Lindsay
McCormack, Jackie
description IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the medicine, as well as the input from patient groups (PGs), patients, and carers. In 2020, SMC commenced a stakeholder evaluation of the DAD including a workshop with PGs and public partners (members of the public who volunteer with SMC) to explore the potential for using the DAD more widely.MethodsPGs and public partners, all having significant experience of engaging with SMC, participated in the workshop. Feedback was gathered using virtual post-it notes, collated and analysed for key themes. We also gathered oral feedback from participants. Sample DADs were distributed for two medicines recently appraised, one of which included a Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meeting. These were chosen because they reflect different aspects of public and patient involvement at SMC, including how this is presented in the DAD.ResultsOverall, the workshop participants (n=7) recognised the DAD was a useful document for the clinicians who are its primary audience. Its language was perceived to be challenging, including complex information that is not accessible to a wide audience and may only be fully understood by those with a good understanding and knowledge of HTA. This was a key barrier to using the DAD more widely, in particular the health economics information. Suggestions for broadening the audience of the DAD included summaries of key points and an introductory section clarifying the purpose of the DAD and its intended audience, along with signposting to the plain language summary produced by SMC. These will be implemented where possible.ConclusionsImproving how SMC communicates decisions to patients and the public, by working in partnership with these stakeholders, will help strengthen public involvement throughout the HTA process.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462322001143
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11738231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462322001143</cupid><sourcerecordid>2756912481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2133-460ac4fc6d9f07368fbebeafbd82e0c04aa9029d67013194d243e759d3921a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdTWvZmZWUuoTKi20rkMmudOmdCY1mSn4701pUURc3cU557sHDkLXlNxSQrO7OWFSCsk4Y4RQKvgJ6lGR0YHkIj9Fvb082Ovn6CLGdfJwUpAeKqczyfFMtw6aFuvG4llXbpzBMwhxC6Z1O4h42uDFCvDc-LZ1cYXfwDrjmqSMfRN9aF1X4wdotduAxSO7cwbwgzddnaiX6KzSmwhXx9tH70-Pi_HLYDJ9fh2PJgPDKOepHNFGVEbaoiIZl3lVQgm6Km3OgBgitC4IK6zMUndaCMsEh2xYWF4wqkXF--j-wN12ZQ3WpNdBb9Q2uFqHT-W1U7-Vxq3U0u8UpRnPGaeJcHMkBP_RQWzV2nehSaUVy4ayoEzkexc9uEzwMQaovl9QovZjqD9jpAw_ZnRdBmeX8IP-P_UF3FeMDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756912481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Pierre, Miranda ; Dickson, Jennifer ; Lockhart, Lindsay ; McCormack, Jackie</creator><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Miranda ; Dickson, Jennifer ; Lockhart, Lindsay ; McCormack, Jackie</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the medicine, as well as the input from patient groups (PGs), patients, and carers. In 2020, SMC commenced a stakeholder evaluation of the DAD including a workshop with PGs and public partners (members of the public who volunteer with SMC) to explore the potential for using the DAD more widely.MethodsPGs and public partners, all having significant experience of engaging with SMC, participated in the workshop. Feedback was gathered using virtual post-it notes, collated and analysed for key themes. We also gathered oral feedback from participants. Sample DADs were distributed for two medicines recently appraised, one of which included a Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meeting. These were chosen because they reflect different aspects of public and patient involvement at SMC, including how this is presented in the DAD.ResultsOverall, the workshop participants (n=7) recognised the DAD was a useful document for the clinicians who are its primary audience. Its language was perceived to be challenging, including complex information that is not accessible to a wide audience and may only be fully understood by those with a good understanding and knowledge of HTA. This was a key barrier to using the DAD more widely, in particular the health economics information. Suggestions for broadening the audience of the DAD included summaries of key points and an introductory section clarifying the purpose of the DAD and its intended audience, along with signposting to the plain language summary produced by SMC. These will be implemented where possible.ConclusionsImproving how SMC communicates decisions to patients and the public, by working in partnership with these stakeholders, will help strengthen public involvement throughout the HTA process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462322001143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Consortia ; Documents ; Feedback ; Language ; Medicine ; Oral Presentations ; Public involvement ; Technology assessment ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S24-S24</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2756912481/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2756912481?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11669,27903,27904,36039,44342,72706,74641</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormack, Jackie</creatorcontrib><title>OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the medicine, as well as the input from patient groups (PGs), patients, and carers. In 2020, SMC commenced a stakeholder evaluation of the DAD including a workshop with PGs and public partners (members of the public who volunteer with SMC) to explore the potential for using the DAD more widely.MethodsPGs and public partners, all having significant experience of engaging with SMC, participated in the workshop. Feedback was gathered using virtual post-it notes, collated and analysed for key themes. We also gathered oral feedback from participants. Sample DADs were distributed for two medicines recently appraised, one of which included a Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meeting. These were chosen because they reflect different aspects of public and patient involvement at SMC, including how this is presented in the DAD.ResultsOverall, the workshop participants (n=7) recognised the DAD was a useful document for the clinicians who are its primary audience. Its language was perceived to be challenging, including complex information that is not accessible to a wide audience and may only be fully understood by those with a good understanding and knowledge of HTA. This was a key barrier to using the DAD more widely, in particular the health economics information. Suggestions for broadening the audience of the DAD included summaries of key points and an introductory section clarifying the purpose of the DAD and its intended audience, along with signposting to the plain language summary produced by SMC. These will be implemented where possible.ConclusionsImproving how SMC communicates decisions to patients and the public, by working in partnership with these stakeholders, will help strengthen public involvement throughout the HTA process.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Public involvement</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdTWvZmZWUuoTKi20rkMmudOmdCY1mSn4701pUURc3cU557sHDkLXlNxSQrO7OWFSCsk4Y4RQKvgJ6lGR0YHkIj9Fvb082Ovn6CLGdfJwUpAeKqczyfFMtw6aFuvG4llXbpzBMwhxC6Z1O4h42uDFCvDc-LZ1cYXfwDrjmqSMfRN9aF1X4wdotduAxSO7cwbwgzddnaiX6KzSmwhXx9tH70-Pi_HLYDJ9fh2PJgPDKOepHNFGVEbaoiIZl3lVQgm6Km3OgBgitC4IK6zMUndaCMsEh2xYWF4wqkXF--j-wN12ZQ3WpNdBb9Q2uFqHT-W1U7-Vxq3U0u8UpRnPGaeJcHMkBP_RQWzV2nehSaUVy4ayoEzkexc9uEzwMQaovl9QovZjqD9jpAw_ZnRdBmeX8IP-P_UF3FeMDw</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Pierre, Miranda</creator><creator>Dickson, Jennifer</creator><creator>Lockhart, Lindsay</creator><creator>McCormack, Jackie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document</title><author>Pierre, Miranda ; Dickson, Jennifer ; Lockhart, Lindsay ; McCormack, Jackie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2133-460ac4fc6d9f07368fbebeafbd82e0c04aa9029d67013194d243e759d3921a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Public involvement</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormack, Jackie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pierre, Miranda</au><au>Dickson, Jennifer</au><au>Lockhart, Lindsay</au><au>McCormack, Jackie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S24</spage><epage>S24</epage><pages>S24-S24</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines, the primary output of which is a document referred to as the Detailed Advice Document (DAD). This comprises an overview of all data considered on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the medicine, as well as the input from patient groups (PGs), patients, and carers. In 2020, SMC commenced a stakeholder evaluation of the DAD including a workshop with PGs and public partners (members of the public who volunteer with SMC) to explore the potential for using the DAD more widely.MethodsPGs and public partners, all having significant experience of engaging with SMC, participated in the workshop. Feedback was gathered using virtual post-it notes, collated and analysed for key themes. We also gathered oral feedback from participants. Sample DADs were distributed for two medicines recently appraised, one of which included a Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meeting. These were chosen because they reflect different aspects of public and patient involvement at SMC, including how this is presented in the DAD.ResultsOverall, the workshop participants (n=7) recognised the DAD was a useful document for the clinicians who are its primary audience. Its language was perceived to be challenging, including complex information that is not accessible to a wide audience and may only be fully understood by those with a good understanding and knowledge of HTA. This was a key barrier to using the DAD more widely, in particular the health economics information. Suggestions for broadening the audience of the DAD included summaries of key points and an introductory section clarifying the purpose of the DAD and its intended audience, along with signposting to the plain language summary produced by SMC. These will be implemented where possible.ConclusionsImproving how SMC communicates decisions to patients and the public, by working in partnership with these stakeholders, will help strengthen public involvement throughout the HTA process.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266462322001143</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S24-S24
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11738231
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Audiences
Consortia
Documents
Feedback
Language
Medicine
Oral Presentations
Public involvement
Technology assessment
Workshops
title OP63 Patient and Public Perspectives On The Scottish Medicines Consortium Detailed Advice Document
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP63%20Patient%20and%20Public%20Perspectives%20On%20The%20Scottish%20Medicines%20Consortium%20Detailed%20Advice%20Document&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Pierre,%20Miranda&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S24&rft.epage=S24&rft.pages=S24-S24&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462322001143&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2756912481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2133-460ac4fc6d9f07368fbebeafbd82e0c04aa9029d67013194d243e759d3921a4f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756912481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462322001143&rfr_iscdi=true