Loading…
DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES
We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied behavior analysis 1999, Vol.32 (2), p.123-136 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83 |
container_end_page | 136 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Journal of applied behavior analysis |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Lindberg, Jana S. Iwata, Brian A. Kahng, SungWoo DeLeon, Iser G. |
description | We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their self‐injurious behavior (SIB) was maintained by social‐positive reinforcement. Two individuals participated in a two‐stage comparative analysis within multielement and multiple baseline designs. Fixed‐interval (FI) and variable‐interval (VI) DRO were compared in the first stage; VI DRO and VM DRO were compared in the second. All three schedules effectively reduced the participants' SIB. Treatment for the 3rd individual was conducted in a reversal design to examine the effects of VM DRO when it was implemented in isolation, and results indicated that the procedure was effective in reducing SIB. These findings suggest that VM DRO schedules may represent attractive alternatives to traditional FI schedules because momentary schedules do not require continuous monitoring and may result in higher rates of reinforcement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-123 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1284172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69876764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1v0zAUxSMEYmXwzhOKAPGW4WvHH9nDpDTL2qAskZoMtCfLyRxISZsRt8D-exylGgMJIVmyLf_Ouff6OM5LQCcQIHi_VpWypyA4IdgDTB45MwiI8AhH5LEzQwiDJwSlR84zY9YIAUaMPnWOAJGAccZmztn5KnejPCuTbBFnURIXp26Y2RWm10VSuPmF-zFcJeE8jb3L_DLOynB17RbRMj6_SuPiufOkUZ3RLw77sXN1EZfR0kvzRRKFqVdTBtxjhDFRQXUDfoUqwFT4vmhqUERrykELgECIqvE5tfeAUgy1nQOAEkH8WpBj52zyvd1XG31T6-1uUJ28HdqNGu5kr1r558u2_SI_998lYOEDx9bg3cFg6L_ttdnJTWtq3XVqq_u9kSwQ3P6Ib8HXf4Hrfj9s7XASY4qoYAws9OZfEPjACGeUjBSaqHrojRl0c98vIDnmJ8f85JifJNi2Sqzk1cM5HwimwCzw9gAoU6uuGdS2bs1vTlDfpyPGJuxH2-m7_9aVH8J5CCTgVuhNwtbs9M97oRq-SsYJp_JTtpBQ8uWinINE5BdBkbpV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1416376531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lindberg, Jana S. ; Iwata, Brian A. ; Kahng, SungWoo ; DeLeon, Iser G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindberg, Jana S. ; Iwata, Brian A. ; Kahng, SungWoo ; DeLeon, Iser G.</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their self‐injurious behavior (SIB) was maintained by social‐positive reinforcement. Two individuals participated in a two‐stage comparative analysis within multielement and multiple baseline designs. Fixed‐interval (FI) and variable‐interval (VI) DRO were compared in the first stage; VI DRO and VM DRO were compared in the second. All three schedules effectively reduced the participants' SIB. Treatment for the 3rd individual was conducted in a reversal design to examine the effects of VM DRO when it was implemented in isolation, and results indicated that the procedure was effective in reducing SIB. These findings suggest that VM DRO schedules may represent attractive alternatives to traditional FI schedules because momentary schedules do not require continuous monitoring and may result in higher rates of reinforcement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10396766</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOABAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative analysis ; differential reinforcement of other behavior ; Female ; functional analysis ; Humans ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Interpersonal Relations ; Medical sciences ; Mental disorders ; Middle Aged ; Positive Reinforcement ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Schedules ; Self Destructive Behavior ; self-injurious behavior ; Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology ; Time Factors ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1999, Vol.32 (2), p.123-136</ispartof><rights>1999 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incorporated Summer 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1284172/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1284172/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1854456$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10396766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindberg, Jana S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahng, SungWoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLeon, Iser G.</creatorcontrib><title>DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES</title><title>Journal of applied behavior analysis</title><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><description>We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their self‐injurious behavior (SIB) was maintained by social‐positive reinforcement. Two individuals participated in a two‐stage comparative analysis within multielement and multiple baseline designs. Fixed‐interval (FI) and variable‐interval (VI) DRO were compared in the first stage; VI DRO and VM DRO were compared in the second. All three schedules effectively reduced the participants' SIB. Treatment for the 3rd individual was conducted in a reversal design to examine the effects of VM DRO when it was implemented in isolation, and results indicated that the procedure was effective in reducing SIB. These findings suggest that VM DRO schedules may represent attractive alternatives to traditional FI schedules because momentary schedules do not require continuous monitoring and may result in higher rates of reinforcement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>differential reinforcement of other behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>functional analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Self Destructive Behavior</subject><subject>self-injurious behavior</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0021-8855</issn><issn>1938-3703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkd1v0zAUxSMEYmXwzhOKAPGW4WvHH9nDpDTL2qAskZoMtCfLyRxISZsRt8D-exylGgMJIVmyLf_Ouff6OM5LQCcQIHi_VpWypyA4IdgDTB45MwiI8AhH5LEzQwiDJwSlR84zY9YIAUaMPnWOAJGAccZmztn5KnejPCuTbBFnURIXp26Y2RWm10VSuPmF-zFcJeE8jb3L_DLOynB17RbRMj6_SuPiufOkUZ3RLw77sXN1EZfR0kvzRRKFqVdTBtxjhDFRQXUDfoUqwFT4vmhqUERrykELgECIqvE5tfeAUgy1nQOAEkH8WpBj52zyvd1XG31T6-1uUJ28HdqNGu5kr1r558u2_SI_998lYOEDx9bg3cFg6L_ttdnJTWtq3XVqq_u9kSwQ3P6Ib8HXf4Hrfj9s7XASY4qoYAws9OZfEPjACGeUjBSaqHrojRl0c98vIDnmJ8f85JifJNi2Sqzk1cM5HwimwCzw9gAoU6uuGdS2bs1vTlDfpyPGJuxH2-m7_9aVH8J5CCTgVuhNwtbs9M97oRq-SsYJp_JTtpBQ8uWinINE5BdBkbpV</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Lindberg, Jana S.</creator><creator>Iwata, Brian A.</creator><creator>Kahng, SungWoo</creator><creator>DeLeon, Iser G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES</title><author>Lindberg, Jana S. ; Iwata, Brian A. ; Kahng, SungWoo ; DeLeon, Iser G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>differential reinforcement of other behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>functional analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Self Destructive Behavior</topic><topic>self-injurious behavior</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindberg, Jana S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahng, SungWoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLeon, Iser G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindberg, Jana S.</au><au>Iwata, Brian A.</au><au>Kahng, SungWoo</au><au>DeLeon, Iser G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>123-136</pages><issn>0021-8855</issn><eissn>1938-3703</eissn><coden>JOABAW</coden><abstract>We conducted several comparative analyses to determine the relative effectiveness of variable‐momentary differential‐reinforcement‐of‐other‐behavior (VM DRO) schedules. Three individuals who had been diagnosed with mental retardation participated. Results of functional analyses indicated that their self‐injurious behavior (SIB) was maintained by social‐positive reinforcement. Two individuals participated in a two‐stage comparative analysis within multielement and multiple baseline designs. Fixed‐interval (FI) and variable‐interval (VI) DRO were compared in the first stage; VI DRO and VM DRO were compared in the second. All three schedules effectively reduced the participants' SIB. Treatment for the 3rd individual was conducted in a reversal design to examine the effects of VM DRO when it was implemented in isolation, and results indicated that the procedure was effective in reducing SIB. These findings suggest that VM DRO schedules may represent attractive alternatives to traditional FI schedules because momentary schedules do not require continuous monitoring and may result in higher rates of reinforcement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10396766</pmid><doi>10.1901/jaba.1999.32-123</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8855 |
ispartof | Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1999, Vol.32 (2), p.123-136 |
issn | 0021-8855 1938-3703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1284172 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Behavior Behavior Problems Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy Biological and medical sciences Comparative analysis differential reinforcement of other behavior Female functional analysis Humans Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Intellectual Disability - psychology Interpersonal Relations Medical sciences Mental disorders Middle Aged Positive Reinforcement Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reinforcement (Psychology) Reinforcement Schedule Schedules Self Destructive Behavior self-injurious behavior Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology Time Factors Treatments |
title | DRO CONTINGENCIES: AN ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE-MOMENTARY SCHEDULES |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DRO%20CONTINGENCIES:%20AN%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20VARIABLE-MOMENTARY%20SCHEDULES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20behavior%20analysis&rft.au=Lindberg,%20Jana%20S.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=123-136&rft.issn=0021-8855&rft.eissn=1938-3703&rft.coden=JOABAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69876764%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-63668b1bd14b0b1258448fc1a3ee571e811988bf475e5795521c9381153834c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1416376531&rft_id=info:pmid/10396766&rfr_iscdi=true |