STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE AND TRANSITIVE ASSOCIATIONS: A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

• Published in: Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1984-07, Vol.42 (1), p.143-157
• Main Authors: Fields, Lanny, Verhave, Thom, Fath, Stephen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: associative distance; Biological and medical sciences; cognition; complimentarity; concept formation; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; language acquisition; mediated association; Methodology. Experimentation; nodal training clusters; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology; Special; stimulus equivalence; transitive stimulus control
• ISSN: 0022-5002; 1938-3711
• DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-143

When a number of two‐stimulus relations are established through training within a set of stimuli, other two‐stimulus relations often emerge in the same set without direct training. These, termed “transitive stimulus relations,” have been demonstrated with a variety of visual and auditory stimuli. The phenomenon has served as a behavioral model for explaining the emergence of rudimentary comprehension and reading skills, and the development of generative syntactic repertoires. This article considers the range of relations that can arise between a given number of stimuli in a class, the number of directly established two‐stimulus relations necessary for the emergence of transitive relations, the forms that training sets of stimuli can take, and the number of transitive two‐stimulus relations that can be induced without direct training. The procedures needed to establish and assess transitive stimulus control, the possible interactions between the training and testing procedures, and the constraints these interactions place upon the analysis of transitive stimulus control are also examined. The present analysis indicates that in a transitivity test, choice among such stimuli may be controlled by (1) the relation between the sample and the positive comparison stimulus (transitive stimulus control), (2) the relation between the sample and the negative comparison stimulus (S‐ rule control), and (3) possible discriminative properties that may inadvertently be established in the positive and negative comparison stimuli (valence control). Methods are described for distinguishing these three forms of stimulus control.