Loading…
The requirement for eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) in translation is in direct proportion to the degree of mRNA 5′ secondary structure
Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4A functions as a subunit of the initiation factor complex eIF4F, which mediates the binding of mRNA to the ribosome. eIF4A possesses ATPase and RNA helicase activities and is the prototype for a large family of putative RNA helicases (the DEAD box family). It is t...
Saved in:
Published in: | RNA (Cambridge) 2001-03, Vol.7 (3), p.382-394, Article S135583820100108X |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4A functions
as a subunit of the initiation factor complex eIF4F, which
mediates the binding of mRNA to the ribosome. eIF4A possesses
ATPase and RNA helicase activities and is the prototype
for a large family of putative RNA helicases (the DEAD
box family). It is thought that the function of eIF4A during
translation initiation is to unwind the mRNA secondary
structure in the 5′ UTR to facilitate ribosome binding.
However, the evidence to support this hypothesis is rather
indirect, and it was reported that eIF4A is also required
for the translation of mRNAs possessing minimal 5′
UTR secondary structure. Were this hypothesis correct,
the requirement for eIF4A should correlate with the degree
of mRNA secondary structure. To test this hypothesis, the
effect of a dominant-negative mutant of mammalian eIF4A
on translation of mRNAs with various degrees of secondary
structure was studied in vitro. Here, we show that mRNAs
containing stable secondary structure in the 5′ untranslated
region are more susceptible to inhibition by the eIF4A
mutant. The mutant protein also strongly inhibits translation
from several picornavirus internal ribosome entry sites
(IRES), although to different extents. UV crosslinking
of eIF4F subunits and eIF4B to the mRNA cap structure is
dramatically reduced by the eIF4A mutant and RNA secondary
structure. Finally, the eIF4A mutant forms a more stable
complex with eIF4G, as compared to the wild-type eIF4A,
thus explaining the mechanism by which substoichiometric
amounts of mutant eIF4A inhibit translation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1355-8382 1469-9001 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S135583820100108X |