Immunogenicity of surfactant. II. Porcine and bovine surfactants

• Published in: Clinical and experimental immunology 1991-01, Vol.83 (1), p.41-46
• Main Authors: STRAYER, D. S., HALLMAN, M., MERRITT, T. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology; Antigen-antibody reactions, antigen-antibody complexes, antibody-complement and others. Study of affinity. Antigen presentation; anti‐surfactant antibodies; Biological and medical sciences; Blotting, Western; Cattle; Cross Reactions - immunology; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Fundamental immunology; Humans; Molecular immunology; neonatal respiratory distress syndrome; Pulmonary Surfactants - immunology; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Species Specificity; Surface Properties; surfactants; Swine
• ISSN: 0009-9104; 1365-2249
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb05585.x

SUMMARY Protein‐containing surfactants of human and animal origin are being used increasingly to treat neonatal and adult respiratory distress syndromes. This trend led us to examine the antigenicity of two important preparations of animal surfactant, cow lung surfactant extract (CLSE) and a porcine surfactant preparation, Curosurf. We describe here 15 monoclonal antibodies against Curosurf and four against CLSE. Antibodies were studied by Western blot analysis to determine their ability to recognize protein components of their respective surfactant preparations. They were also tested for their ability to inactivate surfactant in vitro, assayed using the pulsating bubble surfactometer. Several antibodies directed against CLSE or Curosurf functionally inactivate the surfactant to which they were raised. We determined the degree of immunologic cross‐reactivity between antibodies directed to CLSE and Curosurf against the other surfactant and also against human surfactant, both by Western blot and by examining functional inactivation in vitro. Antibodies to these animal surfactants that are commonly used therapeutically may inactivate the specific animal surfactant to which they were raised, as well as human and other surfactants. Generally, when antibodies inactivate surfactant from more than one animal species, they inactivate heterologous surfactants comparably to the extent to which they inactivate the surfactant to which they are directed. Immune complexes between anti‐surfactant antibodies and surfactant have been described in the course of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. The potential pathophysiological importance of anti‐surfactant antibodies may therefore lie in their ability to inactivate administered surfactant, other similar surfactants and endogenous surfactant. In so doing, these antibodies may potentiate surfactant deficiency or pulmonary injury initiated by other stimuli.