Loading…

Facilitation by 8‐OH‐DPAT of passive avoidance performance in rats after inactivation of 5‐HT1A receptors

Pretraining administration of 8‐hydroxy‐2‐di‐n‐propylamino‐tetralin (8‐OH‐DPAT 0.1 mg kg−1), a 5‐HT1A receptor agonist, or buspirone (1 mg kg−1), a 5‐HT1A receptor partial agonist, markedly impaired passive avoidance retention in rats 24 h later. The effect of 8‐OH‐DPAT was prevented by the 5‐HT1A r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of pharmacology 1999-12, Vol.128 (8), p.1691-1698
Main Authors: Otano, Ana, García‐Osta, Ana, Ballaz, Santiago, Frechilla, Diana, Del Río, Joaquín
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pretraining administration of 8‐hydroxy‐2‐di‐n‐propylamino‐tetralin (8‐OH‐DPAT 0.1 mg kg−1), a 5‐HT1A receptor agonist, or buspirone (1 mg kg−1), a 5‐HT1A receptor partial agonist, markedly impaired passive avoidance retention in rats 24 h later. The effect of 8‐OH‐DPAT was prevented by the 5‐HT1A receptor antagonists, NAN‐190 and WAY‐100635, at doses without any intrinsic effect. N‐ethoxycarbonyl‐2‐ethoxy‐1,2‐dihydroquinoline (EEDQ 10 mg kg−1), an alkylating agent that inactivates different G‐protein coupled receptors, impaired retention performance when given 48 h pretraining. The disruptive effect of EEDQ was reversed by 8‐OH‐DPAT or buspirone, given 30 min before training. Non‐specific actions did not account for 8‐OH‐DPAT‐induced reversal of the EEDQ effect since no significant difference in locomotor activity or in pain threshold was found between rats receiving EEDQ or EEDQ+8‐OH‐DPAT. When NAN‐190 (1 mg kg−1) or WAY‐100635 (0.5 mg kg−1) were given before 8‐OH‐DPAT to EEDQ‐pretreated animals, the reversal by 8‐OH‐DPAT of EEDQ‐induced retention impairment was still more pronounced. However, no EEDQ reversal by 8‐OH‐DPAT was found when 5‐HT1A receptors were protected by WAY‐100635 (10 mg kg−1) 30 min before EEDQ. In the hippocampus of EEDQ‐treated rats, 5‐HT7 receptors were less inactivated than 5‐HT1A receptors and significant increases were found in 5‐HT1A but not in 5‐HT7 receptor mRNA levels. Ritanserin and methiothepin (10 mg kg−1 each), antagonists with higher affinity at 5‐HT7 than at 5‐HT1A receptors, prevented the retention impairment induced by EEDQ but did not significantly protect against 5‐HT7 receptor inactivation. The results indicate that the facilitatory effect of 8‐OH‐DPAT is not mediated through 5‐HT1A receptors and suggest that other 8‐OH‐DPAT‐sensitive receptors could be involved in the dual effect of 8‐OH‐DPAT on passive avoidance performance in rats. British Journal of Pharmacology (1999) 128, 1691–1698; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702974
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702974