Loading…

Rapidly progressive coal workers’ pneumoconiosis in the United States: geographic clustering and other factors

Background: Despite significant progress made in reducing dust exposures in underground coal miners in the United States, severe cases of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP), including progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), continue to occur among coal miners. Aims: To identify US miners with rapidly pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2005-10, Vol.62 (10), p.670-674
Main Authors: dos S Antao, V C, Petsonk, E L, Sokolow, L Z, Wolfe, A L, Pinheiro, G A, Hale, J M, Attfield, M D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Despite significant progress made in reducing dust exposures in underground coal miners in the United States, severe cases of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP), including progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), continue to occur among coal miners. Aims: To identify US miners with rapidly progressive CWP and to describe their geographic distribution and associated risk factors. Methods: Radiographic evidence of disease progression was evaluated for underground coal miners examined through US federal chest radiograph surveillance programmes from 1996 to 2002. A case of rapidly progressive CWP was defined as the development of PMF and/or an increase in small opacity profusion greater than one subcategory over five years. County based prevalences were derived for both CWP and rapidly progressive cases. Results: A total of 886 cases of CWP were identified among 29 521 miners examined from 1996 to 2002. Among the subset of 783 miners with CWP for whom progression could be evaluated, 277 (35.4%) were cases of rapidly progressive CWP, including 41 with PMF. Miners with rapidly progressive CWP were younger than miners without rapid progression, were more likely to have worked in smaller mines (
ISSN:1351-0711
1470-7926
DOI:10.1136/oem.2004.019679