Loading…

Oxypurinol improves coronary and peripheral endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease

Coronary endothelial dysfunction is a powerful prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) that is centrally related to oxidative inhibition of nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vascular cell signaling. Xanthine oxidase (XO), which both binds to and is expressed by endothelial cells,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Free radical biology & medicine 2005-11, Vol.39 (9), p.1184-1190
Main Authors: Baldus, Stephan, Köster, Ralf, Chumley, Phillip, Heitzer, Thomas, Rudolph, Volker, Ostad, Mir Abolfazl, Warnholtz, Ascan, Staude, Hans-Jürgen, Thuneke, Felix, Koss, Klaus, Berger, Jürgen, Meinertz, Thomas, Freeman, Bruce A., Münzel, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Coronary endothelial dysfunction is a powerful prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) that is centrally related to oxidative inhibition of nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vascular cell signaling. Xanthine oxidase (XO), which both binds to and is expressed by endothelial cells, generates superoxide and hydrogen peroxide upon oxidation of purines. Whether inhibition of xanthine oxidase activity results in improved coronary vasomotor function in patients with CAD, however, remains unknown. We assessed coronary and peripheral (brachial artery) endothelial function in 18 patients (pts; 65 ± 8 years, 86% male) with angiographically documented CAD, preserved left ventricular function, and nonelevated uric acid levels (233 ± 10 μM). Patients received incremental doses of intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh; 10 −7 to 10 −5 μM), and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and coronary blood flow (CBF) were assessed before and after intravenous administration of oxypurinol (200 mg). Oxypurinol inhibited plasma XO activity 63% (0.051 ± 0.001 vs 0.019 ± 0.005 μU/mg protein; p 
ISSN:0891-5849
1873-4596
DOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.06.004