Loading…

Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes

Purpose By comparing the chromosomal constitution among the arrested cleavage-stage embryos, blastocysts and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) which are all derived from monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes, it is aimed to determine whether chromosomally normal embryos can be reliably selected by blastocys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2009-12, Vol.26 (11-12), p.583-589
Main Authors: Liao, Hongqing, Zhang, Shuoping, Cheng, Dehua, OuYang, Qi, Lin, Ge, Gu, Yifan, Lu, Changfu, Gong, Fei, Lu, Guangxiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33
container_end_page 589
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 583
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 26
creator Liao, Hongqing
Zhang, Shuoping
Cheng, Dehua
OuYang, Qi
Lin, Ge
Gu, Yifan
Lu, Changfu
Gong, Fei
Lu, Guangxiu
description Purpose By comparing the chromosomal constitution among the arrested cleavage-stage embryos, blastocysts and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) which are all derived from monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes, it is aimed to determine whether chromosomally normal embryos can be reliably selected by blastocyst culture. Methods After 1PN zygotes are sequentially cultured for 5 days, the blastocysts and arrested cleavage-stage embryos were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for chromosomes 18, X and Y; G-banding analysis was adopted to analyze the karyotype of 1PN hESCs. Results The diploid rate of blastocysts was 74.6%, which was significantly ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10815-009-9355-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2799555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21278538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3TAQhUVpyfsHZBNEF8nKrSRbr00hXPoIBLJJ10K2RjcOtnQr2QH310eXe0naQrPSwHznaGYOQueUfKKEyM-ZEkV5RYiudM15Rd-hI8plXcm6Ju9LTbiqSCPUITrO-ZEUULH6AB1SrXRTxEeoXS1TXEOAqe-wDXZYcp9x9PhhHm3AMLZpibl03L4OhcsTjLiDYcjYQeqfwGGf4ojHGOImxTB3A9iEfy_rOEE-RR-8HTKc7d8T9PPb1_vVj-r27vvN6vq26rjgU6UssbSVnDrftbLxnDcClCTCEUkkk1Y4LUgriQVumZO-U9RyD77VnEpX1yfoy853M7cjuA7ClOxgNqkfbVpMtL35uxP6B7OOT4ZJrTnnxeBqb5DirxnyZMY-b9e0AeKcTbmqEow1TSEv3yQZZVLxWhXw4z_gY5xTOfOWEYI2QugC0R3UpZhzAv8yMyVmG7TZBW1KfmYbtKFFc_Hnsq-KfbIFYDsgl1ZYQ3r9-f-uz_egtfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216614669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liao, Hongqing ; Zhang, Shuoping ; Cheng, Dehua ; OuYang, Qi ; Lin, Ge ; Gu, Yifan ; Lu, Changfu ; Gong, Fei ; Lu, Guangxiu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Hongqing ; Zhang, Shuoping ; Cheng, Dehua ; OuYang, Qi ; Lin, Ge ; Gu, Yifan ; Lu, Changfu ; Gong, Fei ; Lu, Guangxiu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose By comparing the chromosomal constitution among the arrested cleavage-stage embryos, blastocysts and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) which are all derived from monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes, it is aimed to determine whether chromosomally normal embryos can be reliably selected by blastocyst culture. Methods After 1PN zygotes are sequentially cultured for 5 days, the blastocysts and arrested cleavage-stage embryos were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for chromosomes 18, X and Y; G-banding analysis was adopted to analyze the karyotype of 1PN hESCs. Results The diploid rate of blastocysts was 74.6%, which was significantly ( P  &lt; 0.001) higher than that of arrested cleavage-stage embryos (31.6%), and the diploid rate of hESCs was 97.0%, which was significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) higher than that of blastocysts; the haploid embryos were excluded by blastocyst culture; nevertheless, there still existed such chromosomal abnormalities as mosaic and monosomic in blastocysts and trisomy in hESCs. Conclusions Blastocyst culture is an effective method to select against chromosomal abnormalities, especially the haploids in 1PN embryos; however, development to the blastocyst stage is not a reliable marker for mosaicism or aneuploidy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9355-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19894108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Blastocyst - cytology ; Blastocyst - ultrastructure ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Chromosome Aberrations - embryology ; Chromosomes, Human ; Cytogenetic Analysis - methods ; Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology ; Embryonic Stem Cells - ultrastructure ; Ethanol ; Female ; Fetuses ; Genetics ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ploidies ; Pregnancy ; Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods ; Reproductive Medicine ; Sex chromosomes ; Sperm ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2009-12, Vol.26 (11-12), p.583-589</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799555/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799555/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19894108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Hongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Dehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OuYang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Changfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Guangxiu</creatorcontrib><title>Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose By comparing the chromosomal constitution among the arrested cleavage-stage embryos, blastocysts and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) which are all derived from monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes, it is aimed to determine whether chromosomally normal embryos can be reliably selected by blastocyst culture. Methods After 1PN zygotes are sequentially cultured for 5 days, the blastocysts and arrested cleavage-stage embryos were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for chromosomes 18, X and Y; G-banding analysis was adopted to analyze the karyotype of 1PN hESCs. Results The diploid rate of blastocysts was 74.6%, which was significantly ( P  &lt; 0.001) higher than that of arrested cleavage-stage embryos (31.6%), and the diploid rate of hESCs was 97.0%, which was significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) higher than that of blastocysts; the haploid embryos were excluded by blastocyst culture; nevertheless, there still existed such chromosomal abnormalities as mosaic and monosomic in blastocysts and trisomy in hESCs. Conclusions Blastocyst culture is an effective method to select against chromosomal abnormalities, especially the haploids in 1PN embryos; however, development to the blastocyst stage is not a reliable marker for mosaicism or aneuploidy.</description><subject>Blastocyst - cytology</subject><subject>Blastocyst - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations - embryology</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human</subject><subject>Cytogenetic Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Embryonic Stem Cells - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Sex chromosomes</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtr3TAQhUVpyfsHZBNEF8nKrSRbr00hXPoIBLJJ10K2RjcOtnQr2QH310eXe0naQrPSwHznaGYOQueUfKKEyM-ZEkV5RYiudM15Rd-hI8plXcm6Ju9LTbiqSCPUITrO-ZEUULH6AB1SrXRTxEeoXS1TXEOAqe-wDXZYcp9x9PhhHm3AMLZpibl03L4OhcsTjLiDYcjYQeqfwGGf4ojHGOImxTB3A9iEfy_rOEE-RR-8HTKc7d8T9PPb1_vVj-r27vvN6vq26rjgU6UssbSVnDrftbLxnDcClCTCEUkkk1Y4LUgriQVumZO-U9RyD77VnEpX1yfoy853M7cjuA7ClOxgNqkfbVpMtL35uxP6B7OOT4ZJrTnnxeBqb5DirxnyZMY-b9e0AeKcTbmqEow1TSEv3yQZZVLxWhXw4z_gY5xTOfOWEYI2QugC0R3UpZhzAv8yMyVmG7TZBW1KfmYbtKFFc_Hnsq-KfbIFYDsgl1ZYQ3r9-f-uz_egtfg</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Liao, Hongqing</creator><creator>Zhang, Shuoping</creator><creator>Cheng, Dehua</creator><creator>OuYang, Qi</creator><creator>Lin, Ge</creator><creator>Gu, Yifan</creator><creator>Lu, Changfu</creator><creator>Gong, Fei</creator><creator>Lu, Guangxiu</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes</title><author>Liao, Hongqing ; Zhang, Shuoping ; Cheng, Dehua ; OuYang, Qi ; Lin, Ge ; Gu, Yifan ; Lu, Changfu ; Gong, Fei ; Lu, Guangxiu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Blastocyst - cytology</topic><topic>Blastocyst - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations - embryology</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human</topic><topic>Cytogenetic Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Embryonic Stem Cells - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Sex chromosomes</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Hongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Dehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OuYang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Changfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Guangxiu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Hongqing</au><au>Zhang, Shuoping</au><au>Cheng, Dehua</au><au>OuYang, Qi</au><au>Lin, Ge</au><au>Gu, Yifan</au><au>Lu, Changfu</au><au>Gong, Fei</au><au>Lu, Guangxiu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>589</epage><pages>583-589</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose By comparing the chromosomal constitution among the arrested cleavage-stage embryos, blastocysts and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) which are all derived from monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes, it is aimed to determine whether chromosomally normal embryos can be reliably selected by blastocyst culture. Methods After 1PN zygotes are sequentially cultured for 5 days, the blastocysts and arrested cleavage-stage embryos were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for chromosomes 18, X and Y; G-banding analysis was adopted to analyze the karyotype of 1PN hESCs. Results The diploid rate of blastocysts was 74.6%, which was significantly ( P  &lt; 0.001) higher than that of arrested cleavage-stage embryos (31.6%), and the diploid rate of hESCs was 97.0%, which was significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) higher than that of blastocysts; the haploid embryos were excluded by blastocyst culture; nevertheless, there still existed such chromosomal abnormalities as mosaic and monosomic in blastocysts and trisomy in hESCs. Conclusions Blastocyst culture is an effective method to select against chromosomal abnormalities, especially the haploids in 1PN embryos; however, development to the blastocyst stage is not a reliable marker for mosaicism or aneuploidy.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>19894108</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-009-9355-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2009-12, Vol.26 (11-12), p.583-589
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2799555
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Blastocyst - cytology
Blastocyst - ultrastructure
Chi-Square Distribution
Chromosome Aberrations - embryology
Chromosomes, Human
Cytogenetic Analysis - methods
Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology
Embryonic Stem Cells - ultrastructure
Ethanol
Female
Fetuses
Genetics
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ploidies
Pregnancy
Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods
Reproductive Medicine
Sex chromosomes
Sperm
Stem cells
title Cytogenetic analysis of human embryos and embryonic stem cells derived from monopronuclear zygotes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A26%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cytogenetic%20analysis%20of%20human%20embryos%20and%20embryonic%20stem%20cells%20derived%20from%20monopronuclear%20zygotes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Liao,%20Hongqing&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=589&rft.pages=583-589&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-009-9355-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E21278538%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-8a0a1b751dfcb74f5546e8706d070727a6d960b70ae5a2d7fc81a5fefb9517d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216614669&rft_id=info:pmid/19894108&rfr_iscdi=true