Loading…
Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women
Lack of a universally accepted, easily applied, outcome measure is one reason why urinary incontinence in women is poorly evaluated and treated. 1 The severity index, developed by Sandvik et al, is short and simple enough for use in almost any context. 2 We evaluated the reliability, validity, and s...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ 2001-05, Vol.322 (7294), p.1096-1097 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Lack of a universally accepted, easily applied, outcome measure is one reason why urinary incontinence in women is poorly evaluated and treated. 1 The severity index, developed by Sandvik et al, is short and simple enough for use in almost any context. 2 We evaluated the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the severity index in a wide range of women in Scotland. Age, physical disability (Barthel index), 4 and cognitive disability (abbreviated mental test) were also recorded. 5 Data were collected from women with stable incontinence not undergoing treatment, identified via community nurses; women undergoing initial assessment and non-surgical treatment at a continence clinic; and women awaiting surgical treatment (colposuspension) for stress incontinence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8138 0959-8146 0959-535X 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1096 |