Loading…

Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women

Lack of a universally accepted, easily applied, outcome measure is one reason why urinary incontinence in women is poorly evaluated and treated. 1 The severity index, developed by Sandvik et al, is short and simple enough for use in almost any context. 2 We evaluated the reliability, validity, and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ 2001-05, Vol.322 (7294), p.1096-1097
Main Authors: Hanley, Janet, Capewell, Ann, Hagen, Suzanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Lack of a universally accepted, easily applied, outcome measure is one reason why urinary incontinence in women is poorly evaluated and treated. 1 The severity index, developed by Sandvik et al, is short and simple enough for use in almost any context. 2 We evaluated the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the severity index in a wide range of women in Scotland. Age, physical disability (Barthel index), 4 and cognitive disability (abbreviated mental test) were also recorded. 5 Data were collected from women with stable incontinence not undergoing treatment, identified via community nurses; women undergoing initial assessment and non-surgical treatment at a continence clinic; and women awaiting surgical treatment (colposuspension) for stress incontinence.
ISSN:0959-8138
0959-8146
0959-535X
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1096