Mutagenesis Reveals Structure−Activity Parallels between Human A2A Adenosine Receptors and Biogenic Amine G Protein-Coupled Receptors

• Published in: Journal of medicinal chemistry 1997-08, Vol.40 (16), p.2588-2595
• Main Authors: Jiang, Qiaoling, Lee, Brian X, Glashofer, Marc, van Rhee, A. Michiel, Jacobson, Kenneth A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adenosine - analogs & derivatives; Adenosine - metabolism; Adenosine-5'-(N-ethylcarboxamide); Affinity Labels - metabolism; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; COS Cells; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; GTP-Binding Proteins - metabolism; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Iodobenzenes - metabolism; Ligands; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Models, Chemical; Models, Molecular; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Neuropharmacology; Neurotransmitters. Neurotransmission. Receptors; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Phenethylamines - metabolism; Purinergic P1 Receptor Agonists; Rats; Receptor, Adenosine A2A; Receptors, Biogenic Amine - genetics; Receptors, Biogenic Amine - metabolism; Receptors, Purinergic P1 - genetics; Receptors, Purinergic P1 - metabolism; Structure-Activity Relationship; Xanthines - metabolism
• ISSN: 0022-2623; 1520-4804
• DOI: 10.1021/jm970084v

Structure−affinity relationships for ligand binding at the human A2A adenosine receptor have been probed using site-directed mutagenesis in the transmembrane helical domains (TMs). The mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and characterized by binding of the radioligands [3H]CGS21680, [3H]NECA, and [3H]XAC. Three residues, at positions essential for ligand binding in other G protein-coupled receptors, were individually mutated. The residue V(3.32) in the A2A receptor that is homologous to the essential aspartate residue of TM3 in the biogenic amine receptors, i.e., V84(3.32), may be substituted with L (present in the A3 receptor) but not with D (in biogenic amine receptors) or A. H250(6.52), homologous to the critical N507 of rat m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, may be substituted with other aromatic residues or with N but not with A (Kim et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 13987−13997). H278(7.43), homologous to the covalent ligand anchor site in rhodopsin, may not be substituted with either A, K, or N. Both V84L(3.32) and H250N(6.52) mutant receptors were highly variable in their effect on ligand competition depending on the structural class of the ligand. Adenosine-5‘-uronamide derivatives were more potent at the H250N(6.52) mutant receptor than at wild type receptors. Xanthines tended to be close in potency (H250N(6.52)) or less potent (V84L(3.32)) than at wild type receptors. The affinity of CGS21680 increased as the pH was lowered to 5.5 in both the wild type and H250N(6.52) mutant receptors. Thus, protonation of H250(6.52) is not involved in this pH dependence. These data are consistent with a molecular model predicting the proximity of bound agonist ligands to TM3, TM5, TM6, and TM7.