Loading…

Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study

Background Outpatient ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring is a routine part of the management of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Current systems are limited by patient convenience and practicality. Methods We compared the Zio® Patch, a single‐use, noninvasive waterproof long‐term...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.328-333
Main Authors: ROSENBERG, MICHAEL A., SAMUEL, MICHELLE, THOSANI, AMIT, ZIMETBAUM, PETER J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Outpatient ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring is a routine part of the management of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Current systems are limited by patient convenience and practicality. Methods We compared the Zio® Patch, a single‐use, noninvasive waterproof long‐term continuous monitoring patch, with a 24‐hour Holter monitor in 74 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF referred for Holter monitoring for detection of arrhythmias. Results The Zio® Patch was well tolerated, with a mean monitoring period of 10.8 ± 2.8 days (range 4–14 days). Over a 24‐hour period, there was excellent agreement between the Zio® Patch and Holter for identifying AF events and estimating AF burden. Although there was no difference in AF burden estimated by the Zio® Patch and the Holter monitor, AF events were identified in 18 additional individuals, and the documented pattern of AF (persistent or paroxysmal) changed in 21 patients after Zio® Patch monitoring. Other clinically relevant cardiac events recorded on the Zio® Patch after the first 24 hours of monitoring, including symptomatic ventricular pauses, prompted referrals for pacemaker placement or changes in medications. As a result of the findings from the Zio® Patch, 28.4% of patients had a change in their clinical management. Conclusions The Zio® Patch was well tolerated, and allowed significantly longer continuous monitoring than a Holter, resulting in an improvement in clinical accuracy, the detection of potentially malignant arrhythmias, and a meaningful change in clinical management. Further studies are necessary to examine the long‐term impact of the use of the Zio® Patch in AF management.
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/pace.12053