Loading…

Effects of Testosterone and Progressive Resistance Exercise in Healthy, Highly Functioning Older Men With Low-Normal Testosterone Levels

Context: Aging in men is associated with reduced testosterone (T) levels and physiological changes leading to frailty, but the benefits of T supplementation are inconclusive. Objective: We studied the effects of T supplementation with and without progressive resistance training (PRT) on functional p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2013-05, Vol.98 (5), p.1891-1900
Main Authors: Hildreth, Kerry L, Barry, Daniel W, Moreau, Kerrie L, Vande Griend, Joseph, Meacham, Randall B, Nakamura, Tammie, Wolfe, Pamela, Kohrt, Wendy M, Ruscin, J. Mark, Kittelson, John, Cress, M. Elaine, Ballard, Robert, Schwartz, Robert S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Context: Aging in men is associated with reduced testosterone (T) levels and physiological changes leading to frailty, but the benefits of T supplementation are inconclusive. Objective: We studied the effects of T supplementation with and without progressive resistance training (PRT) on functional performance, strength, and body composition. Design, Setting, and Participants: We recruited 167 generally healthy community-dwelling older men (66 ± 5 years) with low-normal baseline total T levels (200–350 ng/dL). Intervention: Subjects were randomized to placebo or transdermal T gel [2 doses targeting either a lower (400–550 ng/dL) or higher (600–1000 ng/dL) T range] and to either PRT or no exercise for 12 months. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcome was functional performance, whereas secondary outcomes were strength and body composition. Results: A total of 143 men completed the study. At 12 months, total T was 528 ± 287 ng/dL in subjects receiving any T and 287 ± 65 ng/dL in the placebo group. In the PRT group, function and strength were not different between T- and placebo-treated subjects, despite greater improvements in fat mass (P = .04) and fat-free mass (P = .01) with T. In the non-PRT group, T did not improve function but improved fat mass (P = .005), fat-free mass (P = .03), and upper body strength (P = .03) compared with placebo. There were fewer cardiovascular events in the T-treated groups compared with placebo. Conclusions: T supplementation was well tolerated and improved body composition but had no effect on functional performance. T supplementation improved upper body strength only in nonexercisers compared with placebo.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.2012-3695