Comparisons of direct extraction methods of microbial DNA from different paddy soils

• Published in: Saudi journal of biological sciences 2012-07, Vol.19 (3), p.337-342
• Main Authors: Islam, Md. Rashedul, Sultana, Tahera, Melvin Joe, M., Cho, Jang-Cheon, Sa, Tongmin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; DNA; DNA fragmentation; Extraction (Chemistry); Extraction method; humic acids; microbial communities; Microbial DNA; Original; Paddy soil; paddy soils; Purification; purification methods; Soil microbiology; soil microorganisms; soil sampling; yields; الأحماض النووية; التربة; الكيمياء الصناعية; علم الأحياء الدقيقة
• ISSN: 1319-562X; 2213-7106
• DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.04.001

Molecular analyses for the study of soil microbial communities often depend on the direct extraction of DNA from soils. The present work compares the effectiveness of three different methods of extracting microbial DNA from seven different paddy soils. Comparison among different DNA extraction methods against different paddy soil samples revealed a marked variation in DNA yields from 3.18–20.17μg DNA/g of dry soil. However, irrespective of the soil samples and extraction methods the DNA fragment size was >10kb. Among the methods evaluated, method-C (chemical–enzymatic–mechanical) had better cell lysis efficiency and DNA yield. After purification of crude DNA by Purification Kit, A260/A230 and A260/A280 ratios of the DNA obtained by method-C reached up to 2.27 and 1.89, respectively, sustaining the efficacy of this technique in removing humic acid, protein and other contaminants. Results of the comprehensive evaluation of DNA extraction methods suggest that method-C is superior to other two methods (chemical–enzymatic and chemical–mechanical), and was the best choice for extraction of total DNA from soil samples. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods according to experimental goals.