Decoding neural events from fMRI BOLD signal: A comparison of existing approaches and development of a new algorithm

• Published in: Magnetic resonance imaging 2013-07, Vol.31 (6), p.976-989
• Main Authors: Bush, Keith, Cisler, Josh
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; BOLD; Brain - physiology; Brain Mapping - methods; Computer Simulation; Connectivity; Deconvolution; Evoked Potentials - physiology; fMRI; Humans; Image Enhancement - methods; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Imaging analyses; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Models, Neurological; Radiology; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0730-725X; 1873-5894
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.03.015

Abstract Neuroimaging methodology predominantly relies on the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal. While the BOLD signal is a valid measure of neuronal activity, variances in fluctuations of the BOLD signal are not only due to fluctuations in neural activity. Thus, a remaining problem in neuroimaging analyses is developing methods that ensure specific inferences about neural activity that are not confounded by unrelated sources of noise in the BOLD signal. Here, we develop and test a new algorithm for performing semiblind (i.e., no knowledge of stimulus timings) deconvolution of the BOLD signal that treats the neural event as an observable, but intermediate, probabilistic representation of the system's state. We test and compare this new algorithm against three other recent deconvolution algorithms under varied levels of autocorrelated and Gaussian noise, hemodynamic response function (HRF) misspecification and observation sampling rate. Further, we compare the algorithms' performance using two models to simulate BOLD data: a convolution of neural events with a known (or misspecified) HRF versus a biophysically accurate balloon model of hemodynamics. We also examine the algorithms' performance on real task data. The results demonstrated good performance of all algorithms, though the new algorithm generally outperformed the others (3.0% improvement) under simulated resting-state experimental conditions exhibiting multiple, realistic confounding factors (as well as 10.3% improvement on a real Stroop task). The simulations also demonstrate that the greatest negative influence on deconvolution accuracy is observation sampling rate. Practical and theoretical implications of these results for improving inferences about neural activity from fMRI BOLD signal are discussed.