Loading…
Randomised phase II study comparing dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel vs standard-dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer
Background: This randomised phase II trial compared dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) vs standard-dose wPTX for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Ninety patients were randomised to a standard dose of wPTX (80 mg m −2 ) or an escalated dose of wPTX (80–120...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of cancer 2014-01, Vol.110 (2), p.271-277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
This randomised phase II trial compared dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel (wPTX)
vs
standard-dose wPTX for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
Methods:
Ninety patients were randomised to a standard dose of wPTX (80 mg m
−2
) or an escalated dose of wPTX (80–120 mg m
−2
) to assess the superiority of overall survival (OS) with a one-sided alpha error of 0.3 and a power of 0.8.
Results:
The median OS showed a trend towards longer survival in the dose-escalated arm (11.8
vs
9.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.75; one-sided
P
=0.12), although it was statistically not significant. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the dose-escalated arm (4.3
vs
2.5 months, HR, 0.55;
P
=0.017). Objective response rate was 30.3% with dose escalation and 17.1% with standard dose (
P
=0.2). The frequency of all grades of neutropenia was significantly higher with dose escalation (88.7%
vs
60.0%,
P
=0.002); however, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3 or more (40.9%
vs
31.1%,
P
=0.34).
Conclusion:
Dose-escalated wPTX in patients with pretreated AGC met our predefined threshold of primary end point, OS (
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2013.726 |