Loading…

Relationship between obesity and the risk of clinically significant depression: Mendelian randomisation study

Obesity has been shown to be associated with depression and it has been suggested that higher body mass index (BMI) increases the risk of depression and other common mental disorders. However, the causal relationship remains unclear and Mendelian randomisation, a form of instrumental variable analys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of psychiatry 2014-07, Vol.205 (1), p.24-28
Main Authors: Hung, Chi-Fa, Rivera, Margarita, Craddock, Nick, Owen, Michael J., Gill, Michael, Korszun, Ania, Maier, Wolfgang, Mors, Ole, Preisig, Martin, Rice, John P., Rietschel, Marcella, Jones, Lisa, Middleton, Lefkos, Aitchison, Kathy J., Davis, Oliver S. P., Breen, Gerome, Lewis, Cathryn, Farmer, Anne, McGuffin, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Obesity has been shown to be associated with depression and it has been suggested that higher body mass index (BMI) increases the risk of depression and other common mental disorders. However, the causal relationship remains unclear and Mendelian randomisation, a form of instrumental variable analysis, has recently been employed to attempt to resolve this issue. To investigate whether higher BMI increases the risk of major depression. Two instrumental variable analyses were conducted to test the causal relationship between obesity and major depression in RADIANT, a large case-control study of major depression. We used a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in FTO and a genetic risk score (GRS) based on 32 SNPs with well-established associations with BMI. Linear regression analysis, as expected, showed that individuals carrying more risk alleles of FTO or having higher score of GRS had a higher BMI. Probit regression suggested that higher BMI is associated with increased risk of major depression. However, our two instrumental variable analyses did not support a causal relationship between higher BMI and major depression (FTO genotype: coefficient -0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.13, P = 0.73; GRS: coefficient -0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.07, P = 0.62). Our instrumental variable analyses did not support a causal relationship between higher BMI and major depression. The positive associations of higher BMI with major depression in probit regression analyses might be explained by reverse causality and/or residual confounding.
ISSN:0007-1250
1472-1465
DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.130419