Loading…

Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?

Table 1 Total N=2591 No NRT N=1296 NRT N=1295 Unadjusted OR (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR* (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR[dagger] (95% CI; p value) Outcomes at 6 months, n (%) Prolonged cessation (inc. questionnaire data) (primary outcome) 490 (18.9) 261 (20.1) 229 (17.7) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.11)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tobacco control 2014-11, Vol.23 (6), p.524-525
Main Authors: Docherty, Graeme, Lewis, Sarah, McEwen, Andy, Bauld, Linda, Coleman, Tim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 525
container_issue 6
container_start_page 524
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 23
creator Docherty, Graeme
Lewis, Sarah
McEwen, Andy
Bauld, Linda
Coleman, Tim
description Table 1 Total N=2591 No NRT N=1296 NRT N=1295 Unadjusted OR (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR* (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR[dagger] (95% CI; p value) Outcomes at 6 months, n (%) Prolonged cessation (inc. questionnaire data) (primary outcome) 490 (18.9) 261 (20.1) 229 (17.7) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.11) 0.86 (0.70 to 1.06; p=0.16) 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated prolonged cessation 207 (8.0) 122 (9.4) 85 (6.6) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.90; p=0.008) 0.65 (0.48 to 0.88; p=0.005) 0.63 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Self-reported cessation for >=7 days 531 (20.5) 283 (21.8) 248 (19.1) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.13) 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated cessation for >=7 days 200 (7.7) 119 (9.2) 81 (6.2) 0.66 (0.49 to 0.88; p=0.006) 0.64 (0.47 to 0.87; p=0.004) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Reported cessation for >=3 months 401 (15.5) 216 (16.6) 185 (14.3) 0.83 (0.67 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.84 (0.67 to 1.05; p=0.14) 0.86 (0.66 to 1.10; p=0.23) Reports one or more quit attempts lasting >24 h[dagger] 594 (22.9) 289 (22.3) 305 (23.5) 1.07 (0.88 to 1.28; p=0.49) 1.05 (0.86 to 1.27; p=0.60) 1.15 (0.88 to 1.50; p=0.30) Median (IQR) no. quit attempts reported 2 (1-3) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-3) n/a n/a n/a Outcomes at 1 month, n (%) Prolonged cessation since quit date 1040 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.16; p=0.93) 1.01 (0.86 to 1.19; p=0.88) 1.00 (0.80 to 1.26; p=0.96) Reported cessation for >=7 days 831 (32.0) 417 (32.2) 414 (32.0) 0.98 (0.83 to 1.16; p=0.85) 0.99 (0.84 to 1.18; p=0.97) 0.97 (0.77 to 1.22; p=0.80) *Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases included in adjusted analyses. [dagger]Additionally adjusted for all forms of non-trial support.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4215351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43290134</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43290134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b395t-cb798e9d96a0be467105b230ce7042194662c0e0bc5464088561a619608ef4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk1uFDEQhS0EIkPgCCALNmw62O2ftjcgNPwEKQIpmr3ldqozHjztju1GsEDKMeB6OQkeTRgRVqXS--qp7HoIPafkhFImX5XYW-eii2NJMTQtoawhglLS3UMLyqVqGKPqPloQLXnDhWRH6FHOG1LBTtCH6KhlShEh2gX6-S5CxnMGHAd8c_1rjGNTkrfh5vo3dpCzLT6OOM_TFFPBawgThu9TsH7EZQ04WPd1NwrDAK7gIcVtbQdIfrzEn89XuER8NfsS_AjY2RAgZVxnLT5frt48Rg8GGzI8ua3HaPXh_Wp52px9-fhp-fas6ZkWpXF9pxXoCy0t6YHLjhLRt4w46AhvqeZSto4A6Z3gkhOlhKRWUi2JgoFbdoxe722nud_ChYP6cTaYKfmtTT9MtN7cVUa_Npfxm6nmgglaDV7eGqR4NUMuZuuzgxDsCHHOhkrKNKdtJyr64j90E-c01tcZ2imqhSRaVerZvxsdVvl7mAo83QObXGI66Jy1ul6RV13s9X67OaiUmF1AzN2AmF1AzD4g7A8x97FS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781956098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Docherty, Graeme ; Lewis, Sarah ; McEwen, Andy ; Bauld, Linda ; Coleman, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Docherty, Graeme ; Lewis, Sarah ; McEwen, Andy ; Bauld, Linda ; Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Table 1 Total N=2591 No NRT N=1296 NRT N=1295 Unadjusted OR (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR* (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR[dagger] (95% CI; p value) Outcomes at 6 months, n (%) Prolonged cessation (inc. questionnaire data) (primary outcome) 490 (18.9) 261 (20.1) 229 (17.7) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.11) 0.86 (0.70 to 1.06; p=0.16) 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated prolonged cessation 207 (8.0) 122 (9.4) 85 (6.6) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.90; p=0.008) 0.65 (0.48 to 0.88; p=0.005) 0.63 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Self-reported cessation for &gt;=7 days 531 (20.5) 283 (21.8) 248 (19.1) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.13) 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated cessation for &gt;=7 days 200 (7.7) 119 (9.2) 81 (6.2) 0.66 (0.49 to 0.88; p=0.006) 0.64 (0.47 to 0.87; p=0.004) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Reported cessation for &gt;=3 months 401 (15.5) 216 (16.6) 185 (14.3) 0.83 (0.67 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.84 (0.67 to 1.05; p=0.14) 0.86 (0.66 to 1.10; p=0.23) Reports one or more quit attempts lasting &gt;24 h[dagger] 594 (22.9) 289 (22.3) 305 (23.5) 1.07 (0.88 to 1.28; p=0.49) 1.05 (0.86 to 1.27; p=0.60) 1.15 (0.88 to 1.50; p=0.30) Median (IQR) no. quit attempts reported 2 (1-3) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-3) n/a n/a n/a Outcomes at 1 month, n (%) Prolonged cessation since quit date 1040 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.16; p=0.93) 1.01 (0.86 to 1.19; p=0.88) 1.00 (0.80 to 1.26; p=0.96) Reported cessation for &gt;=7 days 831 (32.0) 417 (32.2) 414 (32.0) 0.98 (0.83 to 1.16; p=0.85) 0.99 (0.84 to 1.18; p=0.97) 0.97 (0.77 to 1.22; p=0.80) *Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases included in adjusted analyses. [dagger]Additionally adjusted for all forms of non-trial support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23880552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cancer research ; Carbon monoxide ; Epidemiology ; Experimentation ; Female ; Funding ; Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hotlines ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Nicotine ; P values ; Public health ; Randomized controlled trials ; Research Letter ; Research letters ; Research universities ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Use Cessation Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Vouchers</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2014-11, Vol.23 (6), p.524-525</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2014 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43290134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43290134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23880552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Docherty, Graeme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauld, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Table 1 Total N=2591 No NRT N=1296 NRT N=1295 Unadjusted OR (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR* (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR[dagger] (95% CI; p value) Outcomes at 6 months, n (%) Prolonged cessation (inc. questionnaire data) (primary outcome) 490 (18.9) 261 (20.1) 229 (17.7) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.11) 0.86 (0.70 to 1.06; p=0.16) 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated prolonged cessation 207 (8.0) 122 (9.4) 85 (6.6) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.90; p=0.008) 0.65 (0.48 to 0.88; p=0.005) 0.63 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Self-reported cessation for &gt;=7 days 531 (20.5) 283 (21.8) 248 (19.1) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.13) 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated cessation for &gt;=7 days 200 (7.7) 119 (9.2) 81 (6.2) 0.66 (0.49 to 0.88; p=0.006) 0.64 (0.47 to 0.87; p=0.004) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Reported cessation for &gt;=3 months 401 (15.5) 216 (16.6) 185 (14.3) 0.83 (0.67 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.84 (0.67 to 1.05; p=0.14) 0.86 (0.66 to 1.10; p=0.23) Reports one or more quit attempts lasting &gt;24 h[dagger] 594 (22.9) 289 (22.3) 305 (23.5) 1.07 (0.88 to 1.28; p=0.49) 1.05 (0.86 to 1.27; p=0.60) 1.15 (0.88 to 1.50; p=0.30) Median (IQR) no. quit attempts reported 2 (1-3) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-3) n/a n/a n/a Outcomes at 1 month, n (%) Prolonged cessation since quit date 1040 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.16; p=0.93) 1.01 (0.86 to 1.19; p=0.88) 1.00 (0.80 to 1.26; p=0.96) Reported cessation for &gt;=7 days 831 (32.0) 417 (32.2) 414 (32.0) 0.98 (0.83 to 1.16; p=0.85) 0.99 (0.84 to 1.18; p=0.97) 0.97 (0.77 to 1.22; p=0.80) *Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases included in adjusted analyses. [dagger]Additionally adjusted for all forms of non-trial support.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hotlines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>P values</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Research Letter</subject><subject>Research letters</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Use Cessation Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Vouchers</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk1uFDEQhS0EIkPgCCALNmw62O2ftjcgNPwEKQIpmr3ldqozHjztju1GsEDKMeB6OQkeTRgRVqXS--qp7HoIPafkhFImX5XYW-eii2NJMTQtoawhglLS3UMLyqVqGKPqPloQLXnDhWRH6FHOG1LBTtCH6KhlShEh2gX6-S5CxnMGHAd8c_1rjGNTkrfh5vo3dpCzLT6OOM_TFFPBawgThu9TsH7EZQ04WPd1NwrDAK7gIcVtbQdIfrzEn89XuER8NfsS_AjY2RAgZVxnLT5frt48Rg8GGzI8ua3HaPXh_Wp52px9-fhp-fas6ZkWpXF9pxXoCy0t6YHLjhLRt4w46AhvqeZSto4A6Z3gkhOlhKRWUi2JgoFbdoxe722nud_ChYP6cTaYKfmtTT9MtN7cVUa_Npfxm6nmgglaDV7eGqR4NUMuZuuzgxDsCHHOhkrKNKdtJyr64j90E-c01tcZ2imqhSRaVerZvxsdVvl7mAo83QObXGI66Jy1ul6RV13s9X67OaiUmF1AzN2AmF1AzD4g7A8x97FS</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Docherty, Graeme</creator><creator>Lewis, Sarah</creator><creator>McEwen, Andy</creator><creator>Bauld, Linda</creator><creator>Coleman, Tim</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?</title><author>Docherty, Graeme ; Lewis, Sarah ; McEwen, Andy ; Bauld, Linda ; Coleman, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b395t-cb798e9d96a0be467105b230ce7042194662c0e0bc5464088561a619608ef4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hotlines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>P values</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Research Letter</topic><topic>Research letters</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Use Cessation Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Vouchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Docherty, Graeme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauld, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Docherty, Graeme</au><au>Lewis, Sarah</au><au>McEwen, Andy</au><au>Bauld, Linda</au><au>Coleman, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>524-525</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Table 1 Total N=2591 No NRT N=1296 NRT N=1295 Unadjusted OR (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR* (95% CI; p value) Adjusted OR[dagger] (95% CI; p value) Outcomes at 6 months, n (%) Prolonged cessation (inc. questionnaire data) (primary outcome) 490 (18.9) 261 (20.1) 229 (17.7) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.11) 0.86 (0.70 to 1.06; p=0.16) 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated prolonged cessation 207 (8.0) 122 (9.4) 85 (6.6) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.90; p=0.008) 0.65 (0.48 to 0.88; p=0.005) 0.63 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Self-reported cessation for &gt;=7 days 531 (20.5) 283 (21.8) 248 (19.1) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04; p=0.13) 0.85 (0.67 to 1.07; p=0.17) Carbon monoxide validated cessation for &gt;=7 days 200 (7.7) 119 (9.2) 81 (6.2) 0.66 (0.49 to 0.88; p=0.006) 0.64 (0.47 to 0.87; p=0.004) 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86; p=0.004) Reported cessation for &gt;=3 months 401 (15.5) 216 (16.6) 185 (14.3) 0.83 (0.67 to 1.03; p=0.09) 0.84 (0.67 to 1.05; p=0.14) 0.86 (0.66 to 1.10; p=0.23) Reports one or more quit attempts lasting &gt;24 h[dagger] 594 (22.9) 289 (22.3) 305 (23.5) 1.07 (0.88 to 1.28; p=0.49) 1.05 (0.86 to 1.27; p=0.60) 1.15 (0.88 to 1.50; p=0.30) Median (IQR) no. quit attempts reported 2 (1-3) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-3) n/a n/a n/a Outcomes at 1 month, n (%) Prolonged cessation since quit date 1040 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 520 (40.1) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.16; p=0.93) 1.01 (0.86 to 1.19; p=0.88) 1.00 (0.80 to 1.26; p=0.96) Reported cessation for &gt;=7 days 831 (32.0) 417 (32.2) 414 (32.0) 0.98 (0.83 to 1.16; p=0.85) 0.99 (0.84 to 1.18; p=0.97) 0.97 (0.77 to 1.22; p=0.80) *Adjusted for age, gender, educational level and heaviness of smoking index; 2397 cases included in adjusted analyses. [dagger]Additionally adjusted for all forms of non-trial support.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>23880552</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2014-11, Vol.23 (6), p.524-525
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4215351
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Cancer
Cancer research
Carbon monoxide
Epidemiology
Experimentation
Female
Funding
Health Services - statistics & numerical data
Hotlines
Humans
Male
Medical research
Nicotine
P values
Public health
Randomized controlled trials
Research Letter
Research letters
Research universities
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - methods
Smoking Prevention
Tobacco
Tobacco Use Cessation Devices - statistics & numerical data
Vouchers
title Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20use%20of%20%E2%80%98non-trial%E2%80%99%20cessation%20support%20help%20explain%20the%20lack%20of%20effect%20from%20offering%20NRT%20to%20quitline%20callers%20in%20a%20RCT?&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Docherty,%20Graeme&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=524-525&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E43290134%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b395t-cb798e9d96a0be467105b230ce7042194662c0e0bc5464088561a619608ef4a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781956098&rft_id=info:pmid/23880552&rft_jstor_id=43290134&rfr_iscdi=true