Loading…

The epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate orders in patients with trauma: a community level one trauma center observational experience

Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders in patients with traumatic injury are insufficiently described. The objective is to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of DNR orders in trauma patients. We included all adults with trauma to a community Level I Trauma Center over 6 years (2008-2013). We used chi-s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2015-02, Vol.23 (1), p.9-9, Article 9
Main Authors: Salottolo, Kristin, Offner, Patrick J, Orlando, Alessandro, Slone, Denetta S, Mains, Charles W, Carrick, Matthew, Bar-Or, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders in patients with traumatic injury are insufficiently described. The objective is to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of DNR orders in trauma patients. We included all adults with trauma to a community Level I Trauma Center over 6 years (2008-2013). We used chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and multivariate stepwise logistic regression tests to characterize DNR (established in-house vs. pre-existing), describe predictors of establishing an in-house DNR, timing of an in-house DNR (early [within 1 day] vs late), and outcomes (death, ICU stay, major complications). Included were 10,053 patients with trauma, of which 1523 had a DNR order in place (15%); 715 (7%) had a pre-existing DNR and 808 (8%) had a DNR established in-house. Increases were observed over time in both the proportions of patients with DNRs established in-house (p = 0.008) and age ≥65 (p 
ISSN:1757-7241
1757-7241
DOI:10.1186/s13049-015-0094-2