GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques

• Published in: Geophysical research letters 2013-03, Vol.40 (6), p.1069-1073
• Main Authors: Lagler, K., Schindelegger, M., Böhm, J., Krásná, H., Nilsson, T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Annual variations; Delay; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Empirical analysis; Exact sciences and technology; Geodetics; Geophysical studies; Geophysics; GNSSl; Interferometry; Mapping; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Radio; Regular; Stations; Troposphere; Tropospheric delay; Tropospheric mapping function; Vapor pressure; Water vapor
• ISSN: 0094-8276; 1944-8007
• DOI: 10.1002/grl.50288

Up to now, state‐of‐the‐art empirical slant delay modeling for processing observations from radio space geodetic techniques has been provided by a combination of two empirical models. These are GPT (Global Pressure and Temperature) and GMF (Global Mapping Function), both operating on the basis of long‐term averages of surface values from numerical weather models. Weaknesses in GPT/GMF, specifically their limited spatial and temporal variability, are largely eradicated by a new, combined model GPT2, which provides pressure, temperature, lapse rate, water vapor pressure, and mapping function coefficients at any site, resting upon a global 5° grid of mean values, annual, and semi‐annual variations in all parameters. Built on ERA‐Interim data, GPT2 brings forth improved empirical slant delays for geophysical studies. Compared to GPT/GMF, GPT2 yields a 40% reduction of annual and semi‐annual amplitude differences in station heights with respect to a solution based on instantaneous local pressure values and the Vienna mapping functions 1, as shown with a series of global VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) solutions. Key Points Refined tropospheric delay model based on ERA‐Interim Excellent match of empirical model pressure to in‐situ pressure values Improved station height estimates deduced from VLBI observations