Markets, breastfeeding and trade in mothers’ milk

• Published in: International breastfeeding journal 2015-02, Vol.10 (1), p.9-9, Article 9
• Main Author: Smith, Julie P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; bottle feeding; Breast feeding; breast milk; children; Chronic diseases; cost effectiveness; economic costs; Economic equity; Economic incentives; economic valuation; fiscal policy; Food processing machinery industry; Food supply; Forecasts and trends; gender; Government spending policy; Health aspects; Health care reform; health services; human capital; infancy; Infants; International economic relations; labor productivity; Laws, regulations and rules; market prices; Marketing; markets; Medical care, Cost of; milk; milk substitutes; mothers; National health insurance; Patient outcomes; risk; Safety and security measures; subsidies; sustainable development; trade; weaning; Women; Working women
• ISSN: 1746-4358; 1746-4358
• DOI: 10.1186/s13006-015-0034-9

This introduction to a special issue on the economics of breastfeeding draws attention to the lack of economic justice for women.Human milk is being bought and sold. Commodifying and marketing human milk and breastfeeding risk reinforcing social and gender economic inequities. Yet there are potential benefits for breastfeeding, and some of the world’s poorest women might profit. How can we improve on the present situation where everyone except the woman who donates her milk benefits?Breastfeeding is a global food production system with unsurpassed capacity to promote children’s food security and maternal and child health, but it is side-lined by trade negotiators who seek instead to expand world markets for cow’s milk-based formula. Regulators focus on potential risks of feeding donated human milk, rather than on health risks of exposing infants and young children to highly processed bovine milk. Similarly, policymakers aspire to provide universal health care access that may be unaffordable when two thirds of the world’s children are not optimally nourished in infancy, resulting in a global double burden of infectious and chronic disease. Universal breastfeeding requires greater commitment of resources, but such investment remains lacking despite the cost effectiveness of breastfeeding protection, support and promotion in and beyond health services. Women invest substantially in breastfeeding but current policy - epitomised by the G20 approach to the ‘gender gap’ - fails to acknowledge the economic value of this unpaid care work. Economic incentives for mothers to optimally breastfeed are dwarfed by health system and commercial incentives promoting formula feeding and by government fiscal policies which ignore the resulting economic costs.‘The market’ fails to protect breastfeeding, because market prices give the wrong signals. An economic approach to the problem of premature weaning from optimal breastfeeding may help prioritise global maternity protection as the foundation for sustainable development of human capital and labour productivity. It would remove fiscal subsidies for breast milk substitutes, tax their sale to recoup health system costs, and penalise their free supply, promotion and distribution. By removing widespread incentives for premature weaning, the resources would be available for the world to invest more in breastfeeding.