Prescription errors in cancer chemotherapy: Omissions supersede potentially harmful errors

To estimate the frequency and type of prescription errors in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the day care unit of the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC) of a tertiary care hospital in South India. All prescriptions written during July to September 2013 for p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics 2015-04, Vol.6 (2), p.83-87
Main Authors: Mathaiyan, Jayanthi, Jain, Tanvi, Dubashi, Biswajit, Reddy, K Satyanarayana, Batmanabane, Gitanjali
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antineoplastic agents
Chemotherapy
Complications and side effects
Dosage and administration
Medication errors
Research Paper
Statistics
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To estimate the frequency and type of prescription errors in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the day care unit of the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC) of a tertiary care hospital in South India. All prescriptions written during July to September 2013 for patients attending the out-patient department of the RCC to be treated at the day care center were included in this study. The prescriptions were analyzed for omission of standard information, usage of brand names, abbreviations and legibility. The errors were further classified into potentially harmful ones and not harmful based on the likelihood of resulting in harm to the patient. Descriptive analysis was performed to estimate the frequency of prescription errors and expressed as total number of errors and percentage. A total of 4253 prescribing errors were found in 1500 prescriptions (283.5%), of which 47.1% were due to omissions like name, age and diagnosis and 22.5% were due to usage of brand names. Abbreviations of pre-medications and anticancer drugs accounted for 29.2% of the errors. Potentially harmful errors that were likely to result in serious consequences to the patient were estimated to be 11.7%. Most of the errors intercepted in our study are due to a high patient load and inattention of the prescribers to omissions in prescription. Redesigning prescription forms and sensitizing prescribers to the importance of writing prescriptions without errors may help in reducing errors to a large extent.
ISSN:0976-500X
0976-5018
DOI:10.4103/0976-500X.155484