Through the looking-glass: Objects in the mirror are less real

Is an object reflected in a mirror perceived differently from an object that is seen directly? We asked observers to label “everything” in photographs of real-world scenes. Some scenes contained a mirror in which objects could be seen. Reflected objects received significantly fewer labels than did t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2015-08, Vol.22 (4), p.980-986
Main Authors: Sareen, Preeti, Ehinger, Krista A., Wolfe, Jeremy M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Attention - physiology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Report
Cognitive Psychology
Experiments
Female
Humans
Labeling
Male
Middle Aged
Mirrors
Psychology
Reaction Time
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Is an object reflected in a mirror perceived differently from an object that is seen directly? We asked observers to label “everything” in photographs of real-world scenes. Some scenes contained a mirror in which objects could be seen. Reflected objects received significantly fewer labels than did their nonreflected counterparts. If an object was visible only as a reflection, it was labeled more often than a reflected object that appeared both as a reflection and nonreflected in the room. These unique reflected objects were still not labeled more often than the unique nonreflected objects in the room. In a second experiment, we used a change blindness paradigm in which equivalent object changes occurred in the nonreflected and reflected parts of the scene. Reaction times were longer and accuracy was lower for finding the changes in reflections. These results suggest that reflected information is easily discounted when processing images of natural scenes.
ISSN:1069-9384
1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0761-8