Loading…

A Phase I/II Trial of BNC105P with Everolimus in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BNC105P inhibits tubulin polymerization, and preclinical studies suggest possible synergy with everolimus. In this phase I/II study, efficacy and safety of the combination were explored in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). A phase I study in patients with clear cell mRCC and any...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical cancer research 2015-08, Vol.21 (15), p.3420-3427
Main Authors: Pal, Sumanta, Azad, Arun, Bhatia, Shailender, Drabkin, Harry, Costello, Brian, Sarantopoulos, John, Kanesvaran, Ravindran, Lauer, Richard, Starodub, Alexander, Hauke, Ralph, Sweeney, Christopher J, Hahn, Noah M, Sonpavde, Guru, Richey, Stephen, Breen, Timothy, Kremmidiotis, Gabriel, Leske, Annabell, Doolin, Elizabeth, Bibby, David C, Simpson, Jeremy, Iglesias, Jose, Hutson, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BNC105P inhibits tubulin polymerization, and preclinical studies suggest possible synergy with everolimus. In this phase I/II study, efficacy and safety of the combination were explored in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). A phase I study in patients with clear cell mRCC and any prior number of therapies was conducted using a classical 3 + 3 design to evaluate standard doses of everolimus with increasing doses of BNC105P. At the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), patients with clear cell mRCC and one to two prior therapies (including ≥ 1 VEGF-TKI) were randomized to BNC105P with everolimus (arm A) or everolimus alone (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was 6-month progression-free survival (6MPFS). Secondary endpoints included response rate, PFS, overall survival, and exploratory biomarker analyses. In the phase I study (N = 15), a dose of BNC105P at 16 mg/m(2) with everolimus at 10 mg daily was identified as the RP2D. In the phase II study, 139 patients were randomized, with 69 and 67 evaluable patients in arms A and B, respectively. 6MPFS was similar in the treatment arms (arm A: 33.82% vs. arm B: 30.30%, P = 0.66) and no difference in median PFS was observed (arm A: 4.7 mos vs. arm B: 4.1 mos; P = 0.49). Changes in matrix metalloproteinase-9, stem cell factor, sex hormone-binding globulin, and serum amyloid A protein were associated with clinical outcome with BNC105P. Although the primary endpoint was not met in an unselected population, correlative studies suggest several biomarkers that warrant further prospective evaluation.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3370