In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics 2015-08, Vol.48 (11), p.2879-2886
• Main Authors: Kapron, Ashley L, Aoki, Stephen K, Peters, Christopher L, Anderson, Andrew E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Arthritis; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical materials; Case-Control Studies; Clinical exams; Confidence intervals; Contact; Dual fluoroscopy; Female; Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging; Femoracetabular Impingement - physiopathology; Femoroacetabular impingement; Femur Head - diagnostic imaging; Femur Head - physiopathology; Fluoroscopy; Hip; Hip - physiopathology; Hip joint; Hip Joint - physiopathology; Humans; Impingement; Kinematics; Male; Pain; Patients; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Radiography; Range of Motion, Articular; Rotational; Supine Position; Surgical implants; Translations; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.022

Abstract Visualization of hip articulation relative to the underlying anatomy (i.e., arthrokinematics) is required to understand hip dysfunction in femoroacetabular (FAI) patients. In this exploratory study, we quantified in-vivo arthrokinematics of a small cohort of asymptomatic volunteers and three symptomatic patients with varying FAI deformities during the passive impingement, FABER, and rotational profile exams using dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking. Joint angles, joint translations, and relative pelvic angles were calculated. Compared to the 95% confidence interval of the asymptomatic cohort, FAI patients appeared to have decreased adduction and internal rotation during the impingement exam and greater flexion and less abduction/external rotation in the FABER exam. During the rotational profile, only the FAI patient with the most severe deformities demonstrated considerable rotation deficits. In all participants, contact between the labrum and femoral head/neck limited motion during the impingement exam, but not the rotational profile. Substantial pelvic motion was measured during the impingement exam and FABER test in all participants. Femoral translation along any given anatomical direction ranged between 0.69 and 4.1 mm. These results suggest that hip articulation during clinical exams is complex in asymptomatic hips and hips with FAI, incorporating pelvic motion and femur translation. Range of motion appears to be governed by femur–labrum contact and other soft tissue constraints, suggesting that current computer simulations that rely on direct bone contact to predict impingement may be unrealistic. Additional research is necessary to confirm these preliminary results. Still, dual fluoroscopy data may serve to validate existing software platforms or create new programs that better-represent hip arthrokinematics.