Buffer gas modifiers effect resolution in ion mobility spectrometry through selective ion-molecule clustering reactions

• Published in: Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2012-10, Vol.26 (19), p.2211-2223
• Main Authors: Fernández-Maestre, Roberto, Wu, Ching, Hill Jr, Herbert H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino Acids - analysis; Bridges (structures); Buffers; Charge; Diamines - analysis; Gases - chemistry; Ion mobility; Ionic mobility; Ions - chemistry; Lysine; Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation; Mass Spectrometry - methods; Nitrobenzenes; Organic Chemicals - chemistry; Reduction
• ISSN: 0951-4198; 1097-0231
• DOI: 10.1002/rcm.6335

RATIONALE When polar molecules (modifiers) are introduced into the buffer gas of an ion mobility spectrometer, most ion mobilities decrease due to the formation of ion‐modifier clusters. METHODS We used ethyl lactate, nitrobenzene, 2‐butanol, and tetrahydrofuran‐2‐carbonitrile as buffer gas modifiers and electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) coupled to quadrupole mass spectrometry. Ethyl lactate, nitrobenzene, and tetrahydrofuran‐2‐carbonitrile had not been tested as buffer gas modifiers and 2‐butanol had not been used with basic amino acids. RESULTS The ion mobilities of several diamines (arginine, histidine, lysine, and atenolol) were not affected or only slightly reduced when these modifiers were introduced into the buffer gas (3.4% average reduction in an analyte's mobility for the three modifiers). Intramolecular bridges caused limited change in the ion mobilities of diamines when modifiers were added to the buffer gas; these bridges hindered the attachment of modifier molecules to the positive charge of ions and delocalized the charge, which deterred clustering. There was also a tendency towards large changes in ion mobility when the mass of the analyte decreased; ethanolamine, the smallest compound tested, had the largest reduction in ion mobility with the introduction of modifiers into the buffer gas (61%). These differences in mobilities, together with the lack of shift in bridge‐forming ions, were used to separate ions that overlapped in IMS, such as isoleucine and lysine, and arginine and phenylalanine, and made possible the prediction of separation or not of overlapping ions. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of modifiers into the buffer gas in IMS can selectively alter the mobilities of analytes to aid in compound identification and/or enable the separation of overlapping analyte peaks. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.