Loading…
The Burden of Embodied Cognition
The thesis of embodied cognition has developed as an alternative to the view that cognition is mediated, at least in part, by symbolic representations. A useful testing ground for the embodied cognition hypothesis is the representation of concepts. An embodied view of concept representation argues t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian journal of experimental psychology 2015-06, Vol.69 (2), p.172-178 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The thesis of embodied cognition has developed as an alternative to the view that cognition is mediated, at least in part, by symbolic representations. A useful testing ground for the embodied cognition hypothesis is the representation of concepts. An embodied view of concept representation argues that concepts are represented in a modality-specific format. I argue that questions about representational format are tractable only in the context of explicit hypotheses about how information spreads among conceptual representations and sensorimotor systems. When reasonable alternatives to the embodied cognition hypothesis are clearly defined, the available evidence does not distinguish between the embodied cognition hypothesis and those alternatives. Furthermore, I argue, the available data that are theoretically constraining indicate that concepts are more than just sensory and motor content. As such, the embodied/nonembodied debate is either largely resolved or at a point where the embodied and nonembodied approaches are no longer coherently distinct theories. This situation merits a reconsideration of what the available evidence can tell us about the structure of the conceptual system. I suggest that it is the independence of thought from perception and action that makes human cognition special-and that independence is made possible by the representational distinction between concepts and sensorimotor representations.
La thèse de la cognition incarnée s'est développée en tant que thèse différente de celle voulant que la cognition soit l'objet d'une médiation, tout au moins, par des représentations symboliques. Un bon élément pour la vérification de la théorie de la cognition incarnée est la représentation de concepts. La notion intégrée d'une représentation conceptuelle sous-tend que les concepts sont représentés selon un format propre à la modalité. L'auteur avance que les questions au sujet du format représentationnel peuvent être résolues uniquement dans le contexte d'hypothèses explicites au sujet de la façon dont l'information se répartit parmi les systèmes des représentations conceptuelles et sensorimoteur. Lorsque desthèses raisonnables pouvant remplacer l'hypothèse de la cognition incarnée sont clairement définies, les données disponibles ne permettent pas de faire la distinction entre l'hypothèse de la cognition incarnée et ces autres thèses. De plus, l'auteur soutient que les données disponibles qui sont contraignantes d'un point de vue théorique i |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1196-1961 1878-7290 |
DOI: | 10.1037/cep0000060 |