Loading…
Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry
Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital.Design Retrospective c...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ (Online) 2016-04, Vol.353, p.i1653-i1653 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-783c978e482bca88818087af6350836771067b3a634132bf878703974e72cb623 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | i1653 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | i1653 |
container_title | BMJ (Online) |
container_volume | 353 |
creator | Bradley, Steven M Liu, Wenhui Chan, Paul S Nallamothu, Brahmajee K Grunwald, Gary K Self, Alyssa Sasson, Comilla Varosy, Paul D Anderson, Monique L Schneider, Preston M Ho, P Michael |
description | Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital.Design Retrospective cohort studySetting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12.Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt.Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts).Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge.Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.i1653 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4823520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4025963581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-783c978e482bca88818087af6350836771067b3a634132bf878703974e72cb623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9rFDEUxYMottQ--AUkoA_6MDV_dpKMDwWpugoFQSo-hkzmTucuM5M1ySzsN_HjmnZrqYJPScgv556cQ8hzzs44l-ptO23OkKtaPiLHXNeq4kbKxw_2R-Q0pQ1jTEhtGlU_JUdCs1oowY7Jrw_QYxtxHF3GMNOME1CcM8SdGxN1c0fDkn2YINHQU-9ih85TFyOkXEA6hLTF7MZ3NEKO5QA-4w6oD0OImaa8dHvaxzDRNWT6A_NArwag6wU7GHGGVH2DtCRfNG4NRLjGlOP-GXnSFwdwereekO-fPl5dfK4uv66_XLy_rNqVFLnSRvpGG1gZ0XpnjOGGGe16JWtmpNKaM6Vb6ZRccSna3mijmWz0CrTwrRLyhJwfdLdLO0HnYc7RjXYbcXJxb4ND-_fNjIO9DjtbJspasCLw-k4ghp9LScVOmDyUQGcIS7Jc68aUsU1T0Jf_oJuwxLl8r1CG15o3ShXqzYHyJc4Uob83w5m9qdyWyu1t5YV98dD9Pfmn4AK8OgA3b_6v8xsKLLWD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781571966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Bradley, Steven M ; Liu, Wenhui ; Chan, Paul S ; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ; Grunwald, Gary K ; Self, Alyssa ; Sasson, Comilla ; Varosy, Paul D ; Anderson, Monique L ; Schneider, Preston M ; Ho, P Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Steven M ; Liu, Wenhui ; Chan, Paul S ; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ; Grunwald, Gary K ; Self, Alyssa ; Sasson, Comilla ; Varosy, Paul D ; Anderson, Monique L ; Schneider, Preston M ; Ho, P Michael ; American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital.Design Retrospective cohort studySetting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12.Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt.Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts).Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge.Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1).Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i1653</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27052620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac arrest ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Clinical outcomes ; Data collection ; Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patients ; Quality improvement ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Survival Analysis ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy ; Time Factors ; United States ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2016-04, Vol.353, p.i1653-i1653</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Apr 6, 2016</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to 2016 BMJ</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-783c978e482bca88818087af6350836771067b3a634132bf878703974e72cb623</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1653.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1653.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3193,27923,27924,77465,77466</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27052620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Paul S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald, Gary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Self, Alyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasson, Comilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varosy, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Monique L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Preston M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, P Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital.Design Retrospective cohort studySetting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12.Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt.Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts).Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge.Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1).Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9rFDEUxYMottQ--AUkoA_6MDV_dpKMDwWpugoFQSo-hkzmTucuM5M1ySzsN_HjmnZrqYJPScgv556cQ8hzzs44l-ptO23OkKtaPiLHXNeq4kbKxw_2R-Q0pQ1jTEhtGlU_JUdCs1oowY7Jrw_QYxtxHF3GMNOME1CcM8SdGxN1c0fDkn2YINHQU-9ih85TFyOkXEA6hLTF7MZ3NEKO5QA-4w6oD0OImaa8dHvaxzDRNWT6A_NArwag6wU7GHGGVH2DtCRfNG4NRLjGlOP-GXnSFwdwereekO-fPl5dfK4uv66_XLy_rNqVFLnSRvpGG1gZ0XpnjOGGGe16JWtmpNKaM6Vb6ZRccSna3mijmWz0CrTwrRLyhJwfdLdLO0HnYc7RjXYbcXJxb4ND-_fNjIO9DjtbJspasCLw-k4ghp9LScVOmDyUQGcIS7Jc68aUsU1T0Jf_oJuwxLl8r1CG15o3ShXqzYHyJc4Uob83w5m9qdyWyu1t5YV98dD9Pfmn4AK8OgA3b_6v8xsKLLWD</recordid><startdate>20160406</startdate><enddate>20160406</enddate><creator>Bradley, Steven M</creator><creator>Liu, Wenhui</creator><creator>Chan, Paul S</creator><creator>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</creator><creator>Grunwald, Gary K</creator><creator>Self, Alyssa</creator><creator>Sasson, Comilla</creator><creator>Varosy, Paul D</creator><creator>Anderson, Monique L</creator><creator>Schneider, Preston M</creator><creator>Ho, P Michael</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160406</creationdate><title>Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry</title><author>Bradley, Steven M ; Liu, Wenhui ; Chan, Paul S ; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ; Grunwald, Gary K ; Self, Alyssa ; Sasson, Comilla ; Varosy, Paul D ; Anderson, Monique L ; Schneider, Preston M ; Ho, P Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-783c978e482bca88818087af6350836771067b3a634132bf878703974e72cb623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Paul S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald, Gary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Self, Alyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasson, Comilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varosy, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Monique L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Preston M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, P Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Steven M</au><au>Liu, Wenhui</au><au>Chan, Paul S</au><au>Nallamothu, Brahmajee K</au><au>Grunwald, Gary K</au><au>Self, Alyssa</au><au>Sasson, Comilla</au><au>Varosy, Paul D</au><au>Anderson, Monique L</au><au>Schneider, Preston M</au><au>Ho, P Michael</au><aucorp>American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2016-04-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>353</volume><spage>i1653</spage><epage>i1653</epage><pages>i1653-i1653</pages><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Objective To describe temporal trends in the time interval between first and second attempts at defibrillation and the association between this time interval and outcomes in patients with persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) arrest in hospital.Design Retrospective cohort studySetting 172 hospitals in the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, 2004-12.Participants Adults who received a second defibrillation attempt for persistent VT/VF arrest within three minutes of a first attempt.Interventions Second defibrillation attempts categorized as early (time interval of up to and including one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts) or deferred (time interval of more than one minute between first and second defibrillation attempts).Main outcome measure Survival to hospital discharge.Results Among 2733 patients with persistent VT/VF after the first defibrillation attempt, 1121 (41%) received a deferred second attempt. Deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF increased from 26% in 2004 to 57% in 2012 (P<0.001 for trend). Compared with early second defibrillation, unadjusted patient outcomes were significantly worse with deferred second defibrillation (57.4% v 62.5% for return of spontaneous circulation, 38.4% v 43.6% for survival to 24 hours, and 24.7% v 30.8% for survival to hospital discharge; P<0.01 for all comparisons). After risk adjustment, deferred second defibrillation was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (propensity weighting adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.08; hierarchical regression adjusted 0.92, 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.1).Conclusions Since 2004, the use of deferred second defibrillation for persistent VT/VF in hospital has doubled. Deferred second defibrillation was not associated with improved survival.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27052620</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.i1653</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-1833 |
ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2016-04, Vol.353, p.i1653-i1653 |
issn | 1756-1833 0959-8138 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4823520 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals; BMJ Journals |
subjects | Aged Cardiac arrest Cardiac arrhythmia Clinical outcomes Data collection Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data Female Heart Arrest - therapy Hospitals Humans Male Medical records Middle Aged Models, Statistical Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patients Quality improvement Retrospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric Survival Analysis Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy Time Factors United States Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy |
title | Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A40%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defibrillation%20time%20intervals%20and%20outcomes%20of%20cardiac%20arrest%20in%20hospital:%20retrospective%20cohort%20study%20from%20Get%20With%20The%20Guidelines-Resuscitation%20registry&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Bradley,%20Steven%20M&rft.aucorp=American%20Heart%20Association%E2%80%99s%20Get%20With%20The%20Guidelines-Resuscitation%20Investigators&rft.date=2016-04-06&rft.volume=353&rft.spage=i1653&rft.epage=i1653&rft.pages=i1653-i1653&rft.issn=1756-1833&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.i1653&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4025963581%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-783c978e482bca88818087af6350836771067b3a634132bf878703974e72cb623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781571966&rft_id=info:pmid/27052620&rfr_iscdi=true |