Taking an RDoC lens to the study of panic disorder: A commentary on Hamm et al. and other thoughts on RDoC

• Published in: Psychophysiology 2016-03, Vol.53 (3), p.328-331
• Main Authors: Shankman, Stewart A., Katz, Andrea C., Langenecker, Scott A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agoraphobia; Animals; Behavioral psychology; Humans; National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.); Negative valence system; Panic attacks; Panic Disorder; Psychopathology; Research Domain Criteria; Thinking
• ISSN: 0048-5772; 1469-8986; 1540-5958
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12590

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative put forth by the National Institute of Mental Health represents an exciting new framework in which to study psychopathology. The article by Hamm et al. (2016) is an interesting application of an “RDoC lens” toward a program of research on panic disorder. This commentary highlights the many strengths of the Hamm et al. (2016) study—most notably the article's application of a well‐studied animal model of anxiety (Fanselow's, , threat imminence model) to humans, utilization of an interesting behavioral paradigm (as an analog for avoidance behaviors in panic disorder), and using RDoC to examine predictors of treatment response. This commentary also discusses several questions about RDoC that arise out of Hamm et al. For example, (a) How should participants be selected for RDoC studies? (b) Are RDoC constructs risk factors (and risk factors for what)? (c) Besides Hamm et al.'s, approach, how else can RDoC be used in treatment studies? In sum, Hamm et al. is a very good example of an RDoC study, and in this early phase of the initiative, more examples for how the approach plays out are needed.